Am I the only one that notices that the Sander’s campaign is the only campaign where women, on average, make more than men?

Isn’t the other way to look at this that the Sander’s campaign is the only campaign on average paying women more than men? I feel like glossing over female Clinton staffers making $1,700 less per year than their male workers by considering that “effectively comparable” is a bit rough to swallow.

Am I the only one that picked up on the fact that the Sanders campaign is the only campaign where on average, women are getting paid more than men?

Isn’t the other way to look at this that the Sander’s campaign is the only campaign on average paying women more than men? I feel like glossing over female Clinton staffers making $1,700 less per year than their male workers by considering that “effectively comparable” is a bit rough to swallow.