Uh, and is there the same amount of outrage over an “actual” rape of a mentally disabled boy by members of a high school football team?

I can understand having hunting rifles, but what is with the handguns and assault weapons? Honestly why would ANYONE think they need weapons like this?

Well … wait. Stop. Whoa.

We should start by taking holistic sentencing analyses of crimes that don’t have a victim. I don’t think anyone thinks the system is currently too tough on rapists. It’s too tough on recreational marijuana users.

Croc from Peter Pan, obvs. “No tick-tock will warn you for a ‘gator, kids! Stay out of the water”

A lot of the membership actually disagree strongly with what the spokespeople are saying, possibly because a lot of the membership become members when they purchase a gun. I had a friend who was given a rifle for her birthday, and she received a FREE membership without applying for it. Now she gets their spam and it…

A beer. A beer. I don’t know a single person who drinks beer who would go out without at least a 6 pack, probably a 12 pack.

“She also only had a beer with her, no food, and was quickly tiring.” Going for the Canadian stereotype? It was Molson’s, right? I’m a BIT skeptical about the veracity of this event, also.

Update: lady sees wolf, runs and gets lost for 12 hours. Hears a bear growl, runs again, finds her car, makes up excitingly implausible story.

As a Canadian, I feel like I can say this is the result of too much cheap beer and picking the wrong wild mushrooms.

Correct. This story smells to high heaven of bullshit.

wait just a damn minute! Are you saying that you’re skeptical that a person out picking mushrooms evaded a hungry wolf for 12 hours finally using a bear to defeat it? What are your problems with this story? That the wolf seemed to have a pretty long agenda? That a competent woodsperson who could suss out a mama bear’s…

Lol, no, this woman is full of shit. There's no way in hell this actually happened.

I guess I’ll be that person here and admit that this sounds like a tall tale to me.

Doubtful, especially since the creepy dad claims he searched the internet to make sure it was legal to sell his underage daughter. I’m thinking they may not have been the most faithful Amish.

Right? I first heard about this on The Read a week or two ago, and I was completely horrified. What kind of ridiculous levels of incompetence do you have at this school where you rub a little Vaseline on something as raw as this and call it good? What kind of idiot principal do you have at this school who send a kid…

I hope that young lady’s parents (and their attorneys) are working on some sort of negligent care theory.

Yeah. You need friction to cause rope burn (I’ve suffered enought of it to know). A rope being released from tension might leave a bruise, but that’s it. These people aren’t just racist, greedy assholes trying to protect themselves from a lawsuit, they’re also really incompetent at first aid and rope safety.

That is what doesn’t make sense to me. To get a rope burn, the rope has to have some tautness to it. If the children let go of the rope it would have been slack and thus not able to make a burn like this. I’m calling bullshit on that lawyer’s story. That wound is not a vaseline and Motrin wound.

Holy fuck!