He’s just a pretty man. Peter Frampton was as well, and David Gilmour of Pink Floyd.

Buzzfeed News is reporting this? I’m surprised it wasn’t posted as a list of gifs with the headline of “25 Reasons Why I Think Tennis Is Fixed.”

Okay. I guess if we don’t talk about something it will go away or it means it doesn’t exist? Hmmm. Interesting take.

Nice try, but you obviously cropped out the part she pushes his arm to get by. Therefore the ‘Reaction’.

That was a bump-into-him-on-purpose-to-make-him-notice-but-pretend-nothing-happened move if I’ve ever seen one. Definitely got his attention. They’re going to have sex in a bathroom for sure.

I mean, if you watch just this video, it looks like he’s laughing at something someone said to him off-camera and wasn’t paying attention to the proceedings at all.

More DNA on the car, his repeated requests for Holbach, the purchase of the handcuffs, that sort of thing. If you have info that explains this stuff away, I’m all ears (no snark at all). Maybe he just liked her photography? I don’t know. It started to sound creepy. But maybe I’m biased by the fact that he burned a cat…

I agree. I said he deserved a new trial. The investigation was fucked up for both defendants. The trials were a sham as far as I’m concerned. For all the reasons you stated.

It never was about deciding guilt. It is about deciding if both of them received a fair trial. Avery’s case was put together by officers that owed him MILLIONS of dollars, hated him, and had wrongfully incarcerated him on purpose before. The kid hardly has shit for brains and yet got forced to confess all kinds of…

Ken Kratz is too much of a creep for me to believe his version of anything. I don’t know if Avery is innocent but I don’t think there’s any way he got a fair trial. His nephew definitely didn't.

From what I’ve seen and read about the case, I don’t feel comfortable deciding his guilt. However, at the very least, he deserves a new trial.

FUCK i thought it meant worship, as in “I worship this couple together.” Jesus I am SO FUCKING OLD and now I’M FURIOUS

Past? He has a substance abuse present.

The reason everyone gets up in arms about the hot coffee lawsuit is that it’s frequently brought up as evidence that the civil court system is broken and that people who file personal injury suits are more likely than not lying or exaggerating, when that is not the case. The only people who benefit from tort reform…

It fills my cold, dead heart with warmness whenever someone is correctly informed about the Hot Coffee case. Like aside from McDonald’s bullshit, the media just had a field day at that poor lady’s expense

I’m not the one who brought up the coffee, I’m not the one who spoke in ignorance, and I’m not the one who condescendingly shit all over a victim here. That’s where your precious derailing happened. In the very first post of the thread, making it less “a conversation,” per se, than “an ignorant person being rude.”

It’s appalling how well the media twisted the story to get everyone on the corporation’s side. It’s so telling when they were interviewing people on the street and they were all against her until they saw her injuries, the ones news outlets never ever showed.

Yeah I watched the HBO doc on the coffee case and it completely changed my mind. I felt like a dick for judging the lady. Those injuries were horrific.

Nope she didn’t get anywhere near 2.8 million. Corporate propaganda at its finest.“judge reduced punitive damages to $480,000, three times the compensatory amount, for a total of $640,000. The decision was appealed by both McDonald’s and Liebeck in December 1994, but the parties settled out of court for an undisclosed…

Omg, thank you for this. The poor McDonald’s coffee lady has taken WAY too much abuse. Her suit was completely legit, I studied it in Torts in law school. Damn, can the record just be clear for her!? McDonald’s was reckless with the coffee temperature to get more coffee out of the grounds. She had third degree burns!…