Comedy's subjective, which is why it's almost pointless to score it. The review tells us what he thinks without needing a letter grade for it ;)

I was watching with headphones in, to keep from waking my wife, but I'm sure it was a lost cause … I was laughing so hard at the Investigation Discovery parodys … they need to get that crazy 48 Hours mystery guy to read this kind of thing. He'd be killer.

Dude, read the reviews of "Todd Margaret" … Season One got all "As" and then they randomly canned the reviewer and brought on a guy for Season Two who fucking hated the show. "Cs" from there on … if you want consistency, go read Pitchfork, they're consistently full of shit ;)

Shuttles suck, brah …

Really? Worse than "Pip"? Perspective, biatch ;)

He misspelled lots of shit. That's the hazard of live reviews. What's this … 1,000 words, published two hours after the show aired? I write for a living and I'd be a spelling train-wreck if I had TV Club's deadlines ;)

Hi-de-ho! That's the circle that keeps Mr. Hankey fresh!

This is why weekly reviews of shows often don't work. They do the weekly production schedule because that's how they feel they keep the comedy fresh. If they start doing it the way everyone else does things, the show will be just like any other. I take current SP episodes as a weekly "WTF?" moment … what will these…

As someone who has had a relative go through with electroshock therapy, I'm not happy seeing ECT used as a plot device. But I think the episode as a whole was excellent. And they did get their facts right on ECT itself, though the short term memory loss tends to be stupid stuff like forgetting appointments, mixing up…