kristymasters-christianson
KristyMasters-Christianson
kristymasters-christianson

And they “approved of her having his baby.” Fuck them. Honestly. This upsets me so much. THANK GOD this pervert “got nervous" and aborted the pregnancy cause the last thing this boy needs is to become a dad at 14. Like she hasn't stolen enough of his childhood already.

HIS FAMILY ACCEPTS THEIR RELATIONSHIP?!

You responded to the wrong person, or you were kinja’d.

Incorrect. I love selfies and don't have a Facebook. Try again.

I don’t feel I’m being piled on. Someone else said that, I said I wasn’t bothered because this is basically what commenting on gawker is like.

I think you explained this phenomenon better than I did. I usually do what you do, which is just roll my eyes and scroll by, but today I decided to ask and see what the reasoning is for doing it. I didn’t really get a satisfactory answer besides “people grieve differently” which is strange to me because I wouldn’t say

No I read it. She straight up said it was too hard for her so she was going to ignore the story for her own sake and instead talk about cake. I think that’s tacky and gross. I'm done arguing with you about it though, obviously you think that's cool, and I think it's self-absorbed.

I will from now on thanks.

You got me. I'm actually the one that posted about the cake to begin with! It's been me posting about baby animals and cake all along.

Hahaha okay dude. Typical white feminist nonsense. I’m actually being anti-feminist for saying that choosing to make a murder all about baking a cake is gross. You keep doing you.

Your comment makes a lot of sense. If that was the point she was attempting to make, I sort of understand. I still think it's gross that literally every time someone posts about violence against women someone rushes down to the comments to post a non-sequitur.

What feelings? She literally said “I’m going to ignore this because I can’t talk about it so instead I’m going to talk about my cake" if you can't talk about it, then you just wouldn't. Instead of making it about cake.

If she just went and baked a cake okay, that’s processing it. But posting a comment that has no substance besides stating “I’m going to ignore this to talk about my cake” is performative and gross. It’s wanting “likes” for talking about yourself.

Because we can’t even have a conversation about violence against women without someone jumping in to make it all about themselves it's gross.

Because it’s completely narcissistic to take something horrendous that happened to someone else and make it about you and your cake. If your way to “process” is by needing validation of your narcissism I'm going to judge.

What's the point of a comment like this? You aren't the only one to do it, sometimes people make it about animals or gifs...but why? If the article bothers you so much that you can't comment on it, then why don't you just not comment? Why try to get attention for your feelings and your cake on an article about someone

You're an idiot. Troll somewhere else.

THANK YOU. I love animals. I'm vegetarian. I foster cats and dogs. But the weirdo response to this that somehow shooting the gorilla was the wrong call? That somehow this is just as sad as if that little boy had died? Nope. Nope. Nope. People need to stop anthropomorphizing animals. It's sad that this gorilla was shot

Never change girl.

OMG your last couple of sentences is EXACTLY what happens when I try to discuss politics with my baby boomer parents. They think everything is linear or has one solution, and refuse to hear about complexities...and yet if they KNOW someone on a individual level that is gay or trans or on food stamps...it completely