Yeah, weekends around here do tend to be a little different. Some of these comments are coming from established commenters though which is frustrating. And people calling you a troll? The lack of self awareness is appalling.

She’s really not. Y’all sound identical to the trump supporters over at Fox News spouting off about this story. Really. The comments and assumptions are the same.

I was honestly surprised by how similar this comment section is to the Fox News comments for this story. It's uncomfortable for white liberals when they find out they aren't THAT different from Donald Trump supporters. Hispanic must mean drug cartels! Ugh. Makes me sick.

Damn. You’re pressed as hell! Maybe just don’t read her posts?

Thanks for writing this. I love Kim and it's nice to see a supposedly feminist site treat her fairly for once.

I like Beaches and Hocus Pocus but that’s about all the love I have for Bette. Her roasts on Twitter aren’t even funny anyways, I always end up feeling bad for her like everyone fawns all over what she says like she’s so clever but it’s just embarrassing.

Let me expand on that: it's been well-documented that Tina Fey doesn't give a shit about anything unless it applies to her life directly. The woman has no empathy.

Tina Fey is a dick.

As a CA native you should know it’s spelled: San Bernardino.

Not to the baby either. It still doesn't make both actions morally equal.

I don't presume that with you. I think suffering can be worse than death. We shouldn't be trying to cause pain and suffering to animals, especially not for our own sexual pleasure.

Oh I see. The difference is that you don’t take intention into account. I understand your point, and yes, in some cases the pain inflicted on an animal for food purposes is just as bad as the pain and suffering inflicted by sexual perversion. I still disagree with your moral world view that intentions don’t matter…

Except I never said I agreed with animals being forced to perform/entertain. So you weren't arguing that.

The “right kind” of human pleasure...uh okay. Honestly, you do you. Arguing that aversion to abusing animals sexually is just a social construct, some imaginary line with no real implications or consequences seems odd to me, but it’s your life.

I don't see it as divorcing it completely but okay. I definitely think that if you're taking advantage of someone, even if they never find out, is still wrong. I don't think consequences are the only thing that matter, honestly that seems absurd to me. I don't care about only APPEARING to be a good person, I want to…

All cases of bestiality involve a blatant disregard for the animal involved.

Also: humans are way different from any other animals. Just because a lion can mate with a tiger doesn't mean a human should mate with a primate. Like I said: even anthropomorphizing pets to the extent that you treat them like little humans is harmful to them. And using them sexually is doing that. It messes with…

You're using an ant in your example. I'm not talking about insects. I'm talking about higher functioning animals. The ant comparison isn't relevant.

I would argue you’re still using them as an object even if you’re saying “it’s just peanut butter on my vagina! They lick it off my hands, no difference!” It's YOU treating a living creature (that you've promised to care for) as a means to an end, as something that exists for your pleasure and that's wrong.

You’re assuming I’m not against all of that though. I am. Although hunting I can understand because there are things like population control where the needs of the many out weigh the few. But on an individual level, no I’m not down with killing as a sport.