The “why” is that someone is trying to recoup some portion of the company’s investment because the whole concept has crashed, I assume. 

In that case I would say everything is “easy to miss”.

I mean it’s only easy to miss if you’re not doing the main quest, otherwise you can’t miss it…

It’s almost as if she didn’t want to be attached to this guy for 20+ years!

“Instead of poly couples posting together, Tinder says you need separate bios and encourages users to use the “relationship types” profile feature to indicate their preferences.”

Considering I paid for half of this game by selling back BotW, yeah I’ll stand in a short line to save $35. Plus I can loan it to friends if they want to try it when I’m done. 

Are you trying to be contrarian or just that dense?

How does separate profiles fix this?

“Couple posts (i.e. unicorn hunters) are a notorious scourge of women seeking women on the platform.”

I never understood house arrest. Sign me up! You mean I have to stay home with the internet all day long? Oh no….

It’s a blog covering a variety of topics, it never claimed this was “news”. 

There is no long term plan except to stay elected. 

This sounds expensive. 

Stop tipping. You’re allowing businesses to push the cost of salary from them to us. 

5 houses over 5 years is buying a whole neighborhood now…?

Nah, I’ve seen plenty of guys with beards I wouldn’t do. The beard definitely is part of it though. 

It’s a fanstastic game. Pokémon has never really been about the lore much anyway.

That man can have my pokébabies

Why would death be off limits? It’s one of the most famous plot points in any media, probably only second to love. 

I think they’re just not going away in this case