This made me actually lol. Thanks.

Think about how butthurt you are about this. Now imagine names were named. On a scale of 1 to pissed off, how would you feel about player Y or coach X revealing this imformation? You’d be pissed. But you can spell and form coherent (if biased and homerish) thoughts, so I don’t think you’re the type who would harm…

Now that’s the deflection of a guy who knows he has no logical ground to stand on.

You’re an anonymous opinion maker. I’ll take the word of journalistically vetted sources over the blathering of a anonymous internet guy with no evidence of his own anyday.
I get that the ‘argument from ignorance’ makes sense to you, a Pats homer.
But to the rest of us it’s just a logical fallacy.

Well...when each game has less than 12 minutes of action, you’ve got to find something to fill in all that space.

This would be like me admitting to my wife that I didn’t sleep with the woman she accused me of sleeping, and I can prove it because I was sleeping with a couple other women!
Seriously, I’m not sure how in your twisted pro-Pats brain this seems like a smart way for the league to cover up the Ballghazi fiasco. Why would…

Go PATS!
I’m with you...everyone else is super-biased! Not me, the fucking Pats homer!

I think you have a loose definition of “unproven”.
In fact, I don’t think any amount of evidence will satisfy you.

New England sports fans are the most parochial of all. They can name every Red Sox SS who started more than 2 games since 1952...but only name 10 other SS in the history of MLB.
So, it doesn’t surprise me at all that the only part of any story they can process is the part about their team.
I am fully convinced you could…

What media outlet do you work for as an editor? With those standards I would love to read some of your work.

Add this to this list: