Yeah that's what I said.

Just think about how a computer monitor or TV makes colors. It uses red, green, and blue dots of varying intensities to "create" different colors. Kind of like how pointillists used many dots to create an image, but TVs have three colors and the dots are much, much, smaller. Check out "additive" and "subtractive"…

DSLRs do suck for event video. But camcorders (non-DSLRs) with strong low light performance are still desired. It's true that many pro cinematographers are less concerned with low light performance than an amateur filmmaker might be, but high-end cameras that they use generally perform well under low light conditions…

Does this mean I can play my favorite billiards app in the comfort of my own pocket?

Don Draper hates Find My Friends.

Check the math yourself if you wish: [arxiv.org]

Why is this full of fail? When an object is so close to Earth, fewer people can see it. Think of a radio tower. You might be able to see it if you're 10 miles within its radius (just guessing, depends on height and surrounding terrain), but it is too close to Earth that people outside the radius cannot see it.

It sounds good to me. If the object is too close, the Earth gets in our way of seeing it. Another analogy is seeing a mast of a ship disappear over the horizon. The top of the mast is very close to Earth, but our planet's curvature makes it impossible to see at a certain point.

They're robo-scientists.

Comments like this are why I love Giz and continue to come here and read all of the articles. Thank you, sir.

This is due to motion blur, a function of the speed of the object and shutter speed. The iPhone had a higher shutter speed for that clip.

Yes, because pros always have control over lighting when they are recording an event. Even scenes that are lit by "pros" can have what is considered low-light conditions for a video camera. Good low-light performance matters to pros as well.

It's like feeling safer in a brick building than a skyscraper. But when an earthquake comes, the brick building's rigidity is a flaw rather than a feature.

Every iPhone is special, just like a snowflake!

Of course it's necessary to correct someone when they use the informal definition of bugs. I only hope you correct someone who says that mosquitos are not bugs as well, sticking with the scientific definition of bugs.

Digby Horner. Possibly one of the best names ever.

I do realize that there are 3 billion base pairs in the human genome. That's the only thing I agree with in your outlandish retort. I also realize that 1.5% of those base pairs actually encodes for a gene. Do you know what the other 98.5% is? Some of it has a function, but most of it is junk DNA that became useless…

Not error 9!!!!!

That kinda sucks. Fortunately for me, I only have an iPad.

what?