Well, that was an internet victory if I’ve ever seen one. Thank you, and have a great day =)

I would like to hear from an primarily iOS developer as to why you choose that platform. Was it primarily due to userbase at the time and potential for profits? Or were there other factors involved?

I wonder what the best temperature is for someone asthmatic? For me, I think it is personally around 80f, with low humidity, but I’ve done well in 70f before.

I called game bad? I didn’t even know what game it was, so that has to be a lie :p My original comment is still there. I suggest reading it. Heck, please read it 5 times.

It was, as I’ve never played the game before, I could not identify it from the comic. I have a lot of co-workers and friends who were addicted to Destiny for a time, so I can’t imagine it being bad... I hope.

Rather than prejudging the largest genre of games, how about you think to yourself that there are good RPG’s and bad RPG’s. A good RPG doesn’t have boring encounters.

You aren’t the one making sense. If you change the RPG-combat system to a Fighting combat system, then it isn’t an RPG anymore... Unless now you want to argue what defines an RPG? :p But crap,you probably would, so nvm. I’m done communicating with ya.

Good thing you aren’t as well :p Game Freak has been doing a pretty great job over the last 20 years.

Isn’t that what this is? Isn’t that what the spinoffs are? You aren’t being quite clear on what you want. Besides, the most important thing is the gameplay, and a fighting game like this is miles behind the current system in terms of quality.

What game is this? When you have fights that are boring and repetitive where players are at the point where they want to skip battles, it means that you have failed in the gameplay aspect.

Then it wouldn’t be an RPG, but a fighter... Why change the combat sytem that people love? If you want a fighter, go play Mortal Kombat.

I do think that most Pokemon spinoffs were mistakes, and that Pokemon is pretty dang-good as a turn-based rpg.

Changing an RPG to a Fighter isn’t iteration. That is changing the genre, and at that point, you might as well play another game. Pokemon isn’t Mortal Kombat.

And almost all of them suck, which is why it is a good thing to keep them as spinoffs.

I don’t get it. You want the gameplay of Pokemon, the core of the game series itself, to change? Why not just play a different game?

I work in it you idiot... Why so douchy?

P3P and P4G are honestly examples of Atlus milking their fans for money. Yes, they added some content, but instead I would of rather have had a Persona 5 out years ago instead of remakes and spinoffs like crazy. Filler content is never a good thing for the consumers, heck, it isn’t even good for the developers. It is…

Do you know anything about the game industry? It is a conscious decision. Those at the top are always weighing between profit, development-time, quality, name-recognition, reviews, and future loyalty of the customers who buy the game. The developer usually just does whatever they are told to do in whatever time they…

How is making a good game taking a risk? Companies that think this way are the ones that churn out nothing but rehashed junk.

Exactly, so it is basically a filler title to take money from the ignorant masses for slightly improving a game that was made in 2006. This is never a good thing for consumers.