Dad-a-chum? Dum-a-chum? Ded-a-chek? Did-a-chick?
Dad-a-chum? Dum-a-chum? Ded-a-chek? Did-a-chick?
Is this really that surprising? They’re catering to a market, which is honestly already heavily saturated in this sort of thing.
I saw Diaz getting his face punched in for a whole round, and like his brother, taking the hits until he finally was landing a couple of his own in his wayward throws.. I don’t know what all this ‘giving up’ stuff is about, I eventually saw McGregor get stunned and hurt, and try to change it into ‘ground game’, which…
Completely dependent on the content of the DLC.
Ken Ham, ugh. No, you’re right, this guy is just mad.. Ignore him.
Not ignorant, that’s an actual argument from one of the many religious sects that argue for creationism.. I think someone else’s ignorance is showing however.
Currently it’s the Super 90 in Rainbow Six Siege (aka OP Shottie that can hit headshots at distances others can’t and still maintain short range lethality..).
“non-sentient”, not exactly true.
..as they should. The stories, even written on gawker, have shown how awful ‘cargo’ service is for animals.
I disagree with this only because of the sheer amount of instances in which dogs checked into specialized cargo services have died as a result of horrible conditions. Everything from heat exhaustion in 120+ degrees to freezing to death:
to *not know
I’m actually impressed with your obvious interest in maintaining a dialogue about something that many people would often take as offensive or write off as a waste of their time, so kudos for sticking with my inquiries.
Obviously, we will eventually diverge at a certain point.. And when it comes to the biblical…
I thought the Smash Bros one was actually pretty good. But I’ve seen so few of these to know how ‘bad’ they are. So I can’t say if I agree or if you’re being a typical internet contrarian for that ‘counter bandwagon’ effect. But this one was certainly bad..
Well, much of my understanding of those verses from the Old Testament much like in the Koran, they fit for the time-period in which they were used. Usually referring to militant cultures at the time, and I’m primarily referring to 1 Samuel 15:2-3 — I don’t think this was necessarily just the second coming.. In any…
The “No True Scotsman” is a fallacious argument type which has nothing to do with actual ancestory but rather the changing of the criteria used to assert the correct use of a label.
As an example, it could be argued groups like Westboro ‘do not pervert the faith’, but interpret the claims directly as prescribed by the…
Weird, I know a lot of people who would actually disagree with this. The following comment about the “open world aspect” makes more sense, as for the aesthetic preferences, certainly not universal amongst gamers.
Well, some people attribute the teachings of Jesus Christ to either a single person, multiple people, somewhat fabricated, or a completely metaphorical (non-existent) figure. — I’m more of the opinion that it’s a ‘somewhat true, somewhat false’ of an individual who existed but the stories as they were written are…
Jesus, as the ‘real’ person, a historical figure, or a narrative character, said this stuff? I hesitate to state ‘he said a lot of good stuff’ and then also ‘not believe in him’.
Curious. What do you mean ’not religious’, but ‘believe the teachings of Christ’? I tend to think of ‘religiousness’ as believing in a God and following a doctrine, no? Or are you just not practicing, or just don’t believe in God?
Isn’t that just .. you know.. perspective. — Religion in itself doesn’t seem to evidently lead to this.. I’m always skeptical of these claims that one can’t attain a similar ‘something’ secularly..