Isn’t that what happens after Cars and Coffee?

[Since all the issues with the name have been listed]

I’m enough of a purist to dislike the Mustang branding. But, considering the competition’s name is “Y”.....

This one might do okay with its lower center-of-gravity?

If the name of the car matters that much to you, you’re not that into the car, just the image.

Your ‘15 Mustang would lose race to this one. 

A positive from this being branded a Mustang is that it indicates Ford is all in on making this all electric idea work. They know how valuable the Mustang name is are willing to spend some of that equity on this new vehicle. 

... is always the answer.

‘Lot of good answers, but: Miata Is Always The Answer.

Why does the horse remind me of one Commander-in-Chief? Maybe it’s just a Rorschach test?

‘sitting on your pinto horse eaten’ pinto beans from a rusty tin can with your hobo knife.

Until then, here’s some cgi car porn for you:

I was really hopping for “Mul.E” - being a crossover and sticking with Ford’s equidae themes (mustang, bronco, pinto, etc.)

I can attest the passenger seat of an ‘87 Prelude Si is surprisingly comfortable through third base.

Probably did, but did not mean to give the Klan any slack for being stupid - Sorry.

~ “Some east Asia countries make the Klan look woke.”

They’re all here:

Since the word “definitely” makes it so? There’s a reasonable argument that the landscaper is at fault: 1) Parked in the middle of the road, 2) not having caution cones mandated for commercial (non-CDL) in most states.

Since this is the middle of the road and not a rock on the side of the road, I’m going to be a contrarian and blame the landscape crew.

What’s the highest speed a stock chassis can safely race four-wide on an oval? I’d think the stock chassis should stick with the road courses to keep the speed down?