The Last Tango in Paris.

It would have been wrong prior to 1968. We’re in 2016, hence it’s correct.

Finally a reply that makes any sense.

Well, they might be right, but it is sure not what I’d expect to read over there.

I’ve never tested it myself or read much on it, but I suppose the problem would be petroleum-based lubricants like vaseline.

Why the sad face? If anything, remembering Brando’s backdoor antics should deserve at least a smirk or rolling eyes.

I have no problem on furthering research on an already study subject, though the report that many women fake orgasms so they can get it over with is such common sense that I have a hard time seeing how it deserves news — let alone on Gizmodo of all places.

Which is should have kept.

Which is why there’s the io9.gizmodo.com subsite. Not the case here.

Well, the author of the article appreciated it and edited the text accordingly. Perhaps you’re over sensitive, but not everyone has trouble with others pointing out mistakes so they can be corrected.

Get over it.

What matters is that either margarine or butter will do the trick when those sex toys are to be used in... uh... less naturally lubricated orifices.

Scientific language concerns science.

Two things come to mind reading this article:

I see your point and the LMGTFY bit was just cheeky fun.

You’re right, missed that bit in my ranting.

The simple fact “average temperature” is mentioned just before the value is presented should be more than enough to even the dumbest of dumb people to understand what Kelvin refers to.

It’s not about an “arcane grammar standard,” it’s science. No evolution in grammar will ever allow you to say the sky is red, save if for some reason the name of the color changes. The wavelength of blue will not change just because dumb people want to, as Kelvin will not cease to be an absolute scale. Kelvin is a…

#TeamYes