Because someone who gets a gun to shoot other people is lacking education, right.

Absolutely not. I’m sure your father was a light sleeper and wanted to get a full night’s rest, that’s all.

The Vatican, maybe?

Of course the top picture is fake! The sign actully read “Down to fuck.”

Because it’s so hard to find porn on the interwebs you have to jump at any opportunity Gizmodo grants you.

You have to take into account the different times. When Marylin was around, sexuality was orders of magnitude more taboo than today, so her being openly sexy and flirtatious had a huge impact on people. Dudes would go crazy with whatever little skin was shown, and then she was glamorous and managed to stick some fine…

Never underestimate how naïve and gullible people can be.

And this is NSFW why again?

Hammers: Now with movable parts so they can jam or break on you!

The issue is not upset people voting for a new government, is upset people siding with lunatics that make pie-in-the-sky promises based on bigotry and intolerance in the name of making a nation great exclusively for its own rightful citizens. Those lunatics, in turn, tend to make good on their promises at least…

I do hope this is a facetious comment.

I’m not a democrat, though I do see them as more grounded in reality than wacky republicans. Mind you, I’m not even American nor live in the USA, so my stake in this election is merely as a spectator — and as one who is aware that whatever happens in the USA ripples throughout the world.

And the fact that he actully did not finance his own campaign should go untold? That’s validating a lie as far as I understand it. It’s not about making personal attacks, but about deconstructing falsehoods. And then, after setting the record straight, you can go into how candidate X is better for this and that reason.

Fearmongering is what Trump does, ain’t it? By exaggerating on the country’s issues and blaming others for them while proposing racial and religious prosecution, he’s feeding on people’s primal fears to create a dellusion and gather support.

Sure. Obama campaigned based on a rational, civil agenda. His “Yes, we can” slogan was empowering and hopeful while inclusive and welcoming. All examples I mentioned — including Donald Trump — market themselves as supreme saviors who shall apply extreme measures based on scapegoating and hatred to appease the ire of…

Oooh, a Trump-level rebuttal! Way to go, Ted!

Right, you do have a point. But simply silencing about Trump’s ways implicitly validates his positions as if it campainging for tax reform or civil rights were at equal footing with defending religious prosecution and racial scapegoating.

Yes, I would kill baby Hitler. I’d be a baby murderer and face the consequences of that, but would save the world a whole lot of trouble in the process.

Sure, the best way to fight a bully is to just ignore him. Which doesn’t mean he’ll give up on being a bully, but, perhaps, just bully someone else who fights back.

I did read the article and it conveys the opposite of what you implied in your comment, sarcasm or not. You sure have a tendency to run in circles, don’t you?