kmskis
kmskis
kmskis

I have always felt like Stanley should catch just as much grief as Buckner—his wild pitch allowed the tying run to score and put the winning run in scoring position. I also agree that it should be remembered that it was only Game 6, although I wouldn’t necessarily call losing after having a 3-run lead through 5

Okay, first of all Todd, it might not be the financially wise thing for Adam to pay it off, no matter how much money he has. Given Eaton’s income and trends since the recession, he probably got himself a pretty damned low mortgage rate. Combine that with historic gains in the market, and he very well might be better

Nephew = son of sibling. Older sibling = older son = older nephew.

This is the kind of play my HS JV baseball coach would scream and complain about as being “bush league.” He was a jerk.

People that are aware that TMZ pays money for these sorts of videos?

I was going to rank them 2 then 1 then 3 because 2 was blind without much chance to set himself like with 1 (and I think it was less overrunning and more that the ball may have fluttered a bit). But I read your comment and re-watched and you convinced me of 1, 2, 3 because he does such a good job of cutting down the

Interesting! And from the [usually liberal] 9th Circuit. I guess it was all about the warrant/video surveillance techniques after all.

I’m not an expert, but I don’t think an officer can lie to a suspect about the probable cause supporting a traffic stop. An officer can be wrong about there being an actual violation (e.g., I ran your plates and it said you registration is expired, but now that I have your registration in my hand I see you just

I believe the DS article the other day about the prosecutor’s motion for contempt against Kraft’s lawyers described that part of the sting was that plainclothes officers outside the spa would call call uniformed officers to pull over individuals leaving the spa to get their names and other info as part of the stop.

You claim a deterrent effect in the next sentence acknowledge it will still happen. So you’re just writing a sentence for the hell of it.

This makes no sense. P1 and P2 can both be true independent of P3.

This decision makes it easier for future defendants to defend themselves against unconstitutional police conduct. It is a <sarcasm>little-known</sarcasm> legal concept called precedent. The public policy purpose of suppressing the evidence is its

Sarcasm can only be detected from accounts with photos? Are you new here?

Last 10 years: Eastern conference teams got the top pick 6 times, western conference teams 4 times.

This draft is deeper than 2-3 players. It certainly gives the Lakers more capital than they had before.

Agreed. Pitch counts in 20k games: Scherzer- 119 pitches, Wood- 122 pitches, Johnson- 124, Clemens- 151 (9/18/96), Clemens (4/29/86)- unknown. All those games besides the September game by Clemens were in April or May, with the 151 by Clemens coming in his 3rd to last start with the Red Sox out of playoff contention.

Through the power of sarcasm. Clearly you are not familiar with it.

You can always represent yourself, but if you want to be good at that it would be a good idea to put yourself through 3 years of law school so you are prepared for the off-chance of getting into legal trouble. It’s kind of a like how I took the time to go to culinary school so I can make gourmet meals at home without

This is correct. If he had been stopped/arrested for solicitation at that time and the police got his name, made a video, etc., then no problem. But he was stopped for <<insert made-up traffic stop reason here>>, and therefore, anything coming from the stop is out.

I realize the explanation for this is “she went mad,” but if she wasn’t interested in keeping the Red Keep intact so that she could rule the Seven Kingdoms from it (on the Iron Throne which, uh, might have been destroyed?), then why not just go level the thing right off the bat instead of roasting the city and all of