America sucks. We are obsessed with truck weight instead of axle weight. All the other big countries get it right. Though, this driver must have thought he was hauling 40,000lbs.

I understand how a representative government works. I’m disagreeing with the choices Vermont made and articulating my reasons. The point is, scientifically, GMO is not information. It is not unsafe, it is not unhealthy and there are no environmental contexts in which GMO is useful information. GMO free is pure and…

We need to set the bar higher than what the masses demand if the label is going to be legally required. If someone wants to label their product GMO free, by all means go for it.

You’ve got it backwards. Politics (and the authority) are defining GMOs as an important variable. Misinformation for political gain is…

Science is complicated. Extending scientific based information to laymen is possible. In fact, it’s my job.

Right but who defines reasonable? How about science?

Right but you’ll either ignore all of the “information” or you’ll spend 9 hours at the grocery store.

The only problem is that all of our food will look like Nascar cars.

Seriously. One of the primary goals of GMOs is to increase the genetic control we have over plant material. This allows us to develop resistance to pests and disease. Less pesticide.

Nothing you are saying has anything to do w/ GMOs. Labels should not be applied without scientific meaning. Should we label organic crops that say “sprayed with toxic heavy metals that occur naturally in our environment”?