Strange, pretty sure he’s the Independent Senator from Vermont.

She already laid out her plan nearly a month ago and in some respects it goes further than Sanders plan while in other respects his goes further. Stop this moronic bullshit.

Exactly this. Impeachment needs to reach at least 60% public support to actually have a shot at *removal*. We’re in the low-to-mid 50's.

They aren’t the majority. They’re just the loudest voices.

Quick...someone

This is the same calculated risk he keeps taking.

BuT I thOuGHt ShE wAS aN eViL CapITaLIst aNd coRPorATe sHIlL.

They should just be outlawed completely. California law makes them unenforceable, and not only has it not hurt the states’ business, but it’s probably the key reason why the giant tech boom of the late 20th century/early 21st century happened in Silicon Valley and not Route 128 in Massachusetts.

Exactly, the fascists’ goal is to make everything political so it always comes down to your tribe vs. theirs. Notice how every single person that accuses Trump or his associates of something is instantly derided as a Lib, Dem, “biased,” “partisan,” etc. It’s never about the accusation itself, but simply an attempt by…

He will almost definitely be impeached. It remains unlikely he’ll be removed by the Senate.

Let’s get the obvious out of the way: He’s not going to be impeached. McConnell and the Senate simply won’t let it happen.

I don’t think there is someone flunky enough that is also skilled enough to bypass all the data retention requirements that would come along with a database of America’s most secret secrets.

You know that Democrats are going to subpoena the system that the administration has been dumping all these calls into, and because it’s codeword classified they can’t erase them. That means that some poor staffer with a TS/SCI clearance is going to have to spend weeks going through every word salad conversation this…

This is the same calculated risk he keeps taking. If he is open in the public about it, he normalizes it for his base. And impeachment becomes less ‘right and wrong’ and more political.

I’m not “missing it”. It is just irrelevant under common law for the reasons I explained.

Others have pointed out the inequality here.

The Sergeant at Arms of the US House of Representatives (currently The Honorable Paul D. Irving) is an official law enforcement officer and commands a small staff. However his role is largely security based, ensuring the safety of the members of the House and the premises, issuing identification badges, and…

I am curious about how that would work. I only know the Sergeant-at-Arms in a state legislature, but they are still pretty rigid about the law. You can’t enter my state’s Legislature floor without wearing a jacket and tie and I’ve been stopped so many times trying to run in and out between votes even though the guard…

Call me crazy, but I’m starting to get the vague sense that we may not be able to just reach across the aisle and reason with these folks.

All of this is just more distraction, as clearly the more notable crimes here are Adam Schiff having a thin neck and Nancy Pelosi being a woman.