klone121
klone121
klone121

And yet it is not the one they bring out for press photos.  Shows who the real market is.

Myself and many others thought that the Lightning was going to cost in the mid 40's. I then found out that was the “Pro” model which inexplicably is for fleets only. The I found out that model actually will cost in the low $60's (it’s currently not even available for retail order) and is the one that this article is

And yet it’s left hand drive (at least the example in the photos). The Queen will not be pleased.

The Nissan Altima.  To be fair it is less the cars fault and more the drivers that operate them so recklessly. 

He’s a discount Viscount at best.

An S-Type R engine and trans should drop right in.  These and the LS were very similar.  Those made 400hp or so which would put it into actual Thunderbird worthy specs.

These T-birds share there bones with the Lincoln LS. The Lincoln LS was both technically advanced and better than it’s competitors in some ways while also being wholly unreliable and a nightmare to work on (in other words like a Jaguar S-type).  Trust me this will be in the shop all the time.  Lincoln had access to

I know plenty of people who cross shop the 4runner with a Jeep. Most go with the 4runner. Calling a 4runner a pretender means you probably don’t go off-roading much because they are one of the more popular vehicles.  Same with the GX since you basically get a 4runner with a V8.  I also don’t see how a G-wagon is any

What about the 4runner or the new Lexus GX?

Just wait until Ed-209 starts taking SFPD jobs.

At the time car and driver had it running 0-60 in 5.2 which as they noted was quicker than the V10 S6 at the time. I agree that any of those other cars you mentioned would be a better buy but I think the Taurus is more of a sleeper. You can hear a Charger or G8 coming a mile away with the V8, the BMW is a BMW, but the

Nissan is going to have to stack some incentives on the Leaf to push it out. There’s just too many better alternatives especially considering it has the least used charging system and being air cooled.

The 3.5 Twin turbo SHO is also a super under rated sleeper.  365hp and 0-60 in the high 5's.

Pretty sure all Kawasaki’s have a similar kit that’s been around forever.

My FIL got a new Ridgeline and it seems like Honda made the load height for the tail gate super high just so they could fit a trunk thing in the bed. My old Dakota by contrast had a pretty reasonable load height which was especially good for shoveling dirt into or loading concrete. It still had plenty of ground

Came across an article about the Model T kit when looking for the history of the “Ford” wrench. The adjustable wrench from the kit was so ubiquitous that it became known to many as simply the Ford Wrench.

I’ve since sold the bike but the Kawasaki ZR-7 had a pretty complete kit it did seem a little chintzy but that was probably to keep weight down and so it would fit under the seat:

This is kind of what Foxconn does. They buy up old factories promise the moon and don’t do shit with them. They also get millions in tax breaks by the government so that they essentially get the building for free in return for future products and employment which they proceed to never deliver on. See: Mount Pleasant,

You may be correct on that. It had a regular cab (non existent in the current market) a 5.2 V8 (not sold in this segment since the Dakota was discontinued), and an 8' bed (not sold in this segment since the Dakota changed body styles in ‘94)  All while being significantly more maneuvarable due to it’s overall smaller

Yup, show me where this says EV?  The entire article goes on to talk specifically about the EV truck.