klambake2234
KinglesZ
klambake2234

Its great when mainstream ads use gay characters but I do think it makes sense if we're not represented too frequently. I mean, at most we only take up 5% of the population.

This is a 100 year period. Hirsute pogonotrophic embellishments tend to fluctuate in fashionability over such long periods.

That's kinda funny because I thought Elijah was the worst - his head is too small, his expression is odd, and he's looking in an odd direction. Looks a bit 'shopped.

Oh! Oh! Oh! Experimental Wendy's foods! I work at Wendys! Do This all the time!

So you're a tough guy, then?

I wonder if we're seeing the birth of a near-global biosphere with all these migrations of animal and plant species. In 150 years will all different climate zones look moreoless the same?

I'm not telephobic but I've never been comfortable using phones. Possibly because I live in a city where most of the people use a language I don't speak very well. That and minor speech issues.

I don't doubt you. But whatever the guide's "intentions," a large number of the people who read it will have other motives for following its instructions. The writer knows this and isn't fooling anyone with his subterfuge. This disclaimer doesn't mean anything to copyright groups looking for some action.

"This guide is intended to help people who have already purchased software, but are for whatever reason unable to access their credentials, either temporarily or permanently. "

Maybe Apple is getting ready to put it on the market already and just hasn't told anybody.

I wonder if we'll be using gestures like that when this tech becomes mainstream - it seems a bit regressive to have to remember exactly how to tap a door to get the effect.

Some of those 'protests' look like jokes.

That does look awful dangerous.

i've found myself that non-tech people have developed a terrible foreboding for things tech.

I don't know, with things iPads around I think we may be approaching de-plonkolization.

I don't think its blurred to hide these place's existence as much as to hide its specific layout. Some of these places are royal palaces, I believe, and we all know already we should be spying in there.

I agree. If you're a private individual and you buy art only for its authenticity then you just don't get the point.

How interesting. People today don't seem to go back further than the early 2000s. Even though I'm only 21 I've experienced periods that are nearly "another generation".

Thank god this wasn't successful, it might have complicated the development of the real internet.

It would still be a great loss if it were destroyed, unmanned or no.