What I didn’t see from skimming over the many (and many good) replies: does this guy know how to separate fantasy from reality, and properly recognize the two?

So if it doesn’t make sense to have 12, it doesn’t make sense to have 1? Gotcha.

An isolated terrorist nuke. North Korean attack, in which one or two nukes get through. I think both of these scenarios are more likely than a large scale nuclear exchange, and in both scenarios most of the US is unaffected and you can expect rescue efforts to commence very quickly. You don’t need to involve…

It’s irrelevant what they were originally intended for; if you can use SSBMs as a first strike that removes the opponent’s second strike capability, you don’t need a final MAD blow. It’s not MAD anymore.  

As much as it pains me, I think regressing a few decades on civil rights is preferable to becoming an authoritarian Russian puppet state.

Pretty sure we’re living in a simulation, and the guys running it is simulating what happens when a trump because president. I know that’s what I would do if I had a world simulator at my disposal.

Ah, makes sense. My bad.

At least they didn’t start playing it to make sure it was really a game :)

The key is to pack your suitcase in such a way that we keep anything that might appear to be a triggering device physically separated from anything that might be mistaken for explosive material.

They are exploited, and are cheaper because they are undocumented and aren’t unionized.

From what we know of Gorsuch, he will likely find against Trump, I think. He’s not a big fan of executive overreach. And we know that he’s not impressed with Trump’s tantrums directed at the bench, either.

That’s not at all surprising since TV is probably the only example he knows for how to act “presidential.”

Yeah, though he’ll probably come up with an excuse to quit that sounds good (in his head) sooner or later. His smart brain can think bigly!