Oh, look. Once again—in place of a coherent argument—you've resorted to ad hominem attacks, only moments after making unfounded assumptions about my age.
Oh, look. Once again—in place of a coherent argument—you've resorted to ad hominem attacks, only moments after making unfounded assumptions about my age.
Yes, you can fit "four times as much" text, at the same font size, on a 23" 4k screen versus a 23" 1080p screen. That doesn't translate into "four times as much real estate" if the resulting text isn't, in fact, legible, or, in the case of "BigDanSchneider," he was challenged to explain how rendering a 1080p video at…
Translation: You were challenged to provide an explanation about how resolution could, in any way, impact your so-called "Adult Job," and you failed. Spectacularly.
A 27" 1080p screen and a 27" 4k screen have the same "real estate" if you want apps to display at the same size, in terms of what area of the screen they're taking up. That same screen area will just happen to contain more pixels on the 4k screen. But no, surely, your "Adult Job" requires that it be rendered in…
You're saying that you can "get more work done" with a 4k 27" monitor than a 1080p 27" monitor because of the "real estate"? And pray tell, what are these magical applications that, for some reason, don't allow you to resize them on the 1080p monitor?
4k is nonsensical marketing that offers no improvement to the user, and merely serves to justify monitors/TVs not becoming totally interchangeable commodities.
The benefit of 4k of even a decent-sized TV (55+ inches) is questionable. You have to sit fairly close to realistically tell any difference. A monitor in the…
This, this, a thousand times this. On both counts.
It's the system working-as-intended. No player is exempt from the Tribunal. He'd been punished several times before, and the punishments get worse every time until, like now, he's banned. Most people at this stage would probably have been permabanned. That's likely the only difference.
Japanese attitudes on homosexuality aren't religiously based. Buddhism (Japan's largest religion) doesn't oppose it—the Dalai Lama, in fact, supports marriage equality. Confucianism, and Shintoism likewise don't condemn homosexuality.
Most of the opposition in Japan can be traced back to the modernization that took…
You're so right! Accepting the status quo—and never voicing an opinion about how games should be—is the way to bring about positive change.
Somebody pointed out that error to me the other day—I don't remember ever seeing it—and now it's fucking everywhere. Sometimes I feel like I live in an MMO, and I just got a patch:
"(Do) victims provoke sexual assaults when they dress provocatively or act in a promiscuous manner?
"Revealing clothes" might increase your chance of being harassed, arguablly. Sexually assaulted or raped? No.
Your argument isn't rational—you're directly implying that the woman is bringing it on herself by wearing a "revealing outfit," and would have been prevented by wearing something modest.
That's horrible. Giving your step-mother the benefit of the doubt, though, was it even possible she was just warning you that that's how many (ignorant) people could respond if you were attacked wearing your preferred outfit?—That she was telling you (unfortunately) how that world works, and not that she herself would…
Dubs are generally awful. It really seems like the vast majority of places get random people off the street to do their voice acting. Voice acting is more of an established profession—or at least a well-known one—in Japan. Lots of famous ones.
It depends on how you frame it.
They don't have to listen, but your claim that we don't have the right to tell them what kind of product they should be making simply highlights your ignorance of both capitalism and the purpose of speech in a democracy.
Yeah. If you read what he said written down, there's nothing broken about it.
She's said it repeatedly, in different places. So yeah. http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/relat…