Here’s one from Getty from the floor. Looks like plenty of standing room last night.

Ok, I get working to crop out the arena stuff, but did no one in the graphics dept or at the campaign notice the texas state flag? Or did they think it was some patriotic banner?

While they might have cropped out the rafters, he forgot the GIANT FUCKING TEXAS FLAG on the left.

I hate to break it to you but 3 million people like Hillary more than Bernie.

I’m sorry, what an asshatted FAIL of a comment this is. The article is literally about the barrage of death threats and personal attacks on a state party chair, and you’re explicitly scolding Anna (a Bernie supporter) for covering that story? Because that is a legitimate story. Or maybe you think…

Aggressive, violent threats directed toward women are widespread and underreported. I like Bernie, too, and I voted for him, but you’re human garbage if you think the right thing to do is to sweep this behavior under the rug for the sake of the campaign.

What does you being a woman have to do with this? Nothing. Either chairs were thrown or they weren’t. Either threats were made or they weren’t. You admit yourself that your own video footage has been run on major networks. But then turn around and claim that the coverage has been biased. Cognitive dissonance alert.…

My feeling is, if these had been Trump supporters, would we be so concerned with “telling both sides” and “not painting people with a broad brush”? We already know the answer to this, and it’s no, we would not. We also wouldn’t be satisfied when the candidate in question mumbles a bit about not supporting violence but…

This is the futhest thing from one-sided that could possibly have been written about the incident. Anna went directly to the people involved, got their sides of the account, and even seemed to make quite an effort to humanize them. If anything, it’s one-sided in their favor.

Bernie cannot mathematically win the fucking nomination.

I agree with you on the overall coverage here (I’m sure you know that by the fact that I star pretty much every political comment you make) but I thought this article was reasonable. It’s those individuals’ own words...

She’s liked by at least 3m people.

Are you seriously equating a near-riot at a convention and a woman getting multiple threatening texts every few seconds with...an altercation between an actor and another couple in a late-night incident? No, they aren’t nearly equate-able. Why even bring that up if not to excuse and distract?

Exactly this. It’s not about which candidate you support or whether you think the system is rigged or whether you think Hillary Clinton eats dead puppies for lunch (she does).

And yet she’s... winning... by... around... 10 million votes... and 300 pledged delegates.....

You can’t get more two-sided than literally calling people and asking why they did the stupid thing that they did.

Bernie would get absolutely destroyed by Trump. Hillary didn't even attack him and is millions of votes ahead.

What people don’t understand is that those “Berniebros” that ruined the convention are most likely former Ron Paul 2012 supporters that pulled the same bullshit during the 2012 Nevada Republican convention. That’s something to think about.

Again, provide examples of what the “Bitch” did that was criminal? Or are you just all hot air with nothing to back up your claims?

and yet somehow only one side sent death threats and threw chairs. odd, that