kinjakilledtheavclub
WhoopsLostmyBurnerPasswordAgain
kinjakilledtheavclub

Oh cool, more weird sexism about Libby. Y’all should just be honest about the fact that you’re jealous she doesn’t want to fuck you, it would be a lot simpler.

Nah. They’re going for the evangelicals and people that never wanted this shit in the first place. They’re never going to lose those people that have spent years justifying to themselves that it’s okay that they’re homophobic because they love specific queer folks because “love the sinner, hate the sin” or some shit.

No but don’t you see? Bernie is not actually a Democrat so anything you do to him is fair game. That’s what a good portion of the commentariat here seems to believe, at least.

Their motive is making fun of John McCain’s shitty, useless faildaughter who acts like being a bad Senator’s demon spawn somehow entitles her to have her opinion respected or seen as valuable in any way. It’s about making fun of a god awful child of privilege given a huge platform for no other reason than she came out

My point is that you keep reminding everyone that Kavanaugh is an illegitimate, openly partisan justice that allegedly raped someone and obviously perjured himself in his hearing, and that he was appointed completely upon party lines by a group of senators that made it very clear that they’re completely fine with all

It doesn’t get him off the court, but it can help rally the base to keep hammering the point home that Republicans are more than happy to turn what is supposed to be a non-partisan court into an incredibly partisan one and electing an alleged rapist judge who literally threatened Democrats at his hearing while

I think Baraka’s point is pretty clear here: Schumer and other Democrats with significant power should be using their platform to highlight the illegitimate nature of the courts and the fact that a man credibly accused of rape was appointed to the highest court in the land through partisanship and specifically because

Who the fuck ungreyed you?

Projection and deflection.

Why the fuck should the president be immune to prosecution for committing a crime? The entire point of having an elected civilian leader is that they’re subject to the same laws and guidelines as all of us. Trump isn’t a fucking king.

Which he clearly didn’t fucking do, you disingenuous shit.

What about impeaching him for any of the other laws he’s clearly violating but no one seems to give a shit about, like the fact that he’s clearly still profiting off of his businesses while in office?

Oh cool, so you’re one of those weirdos who uses archaic spellings no one else uses so you can feel cultured and pull this pedantic shit. You’re probably one of those guys who says “whilst” and thinks it makes them sound really smart, too.

You: calls people morons and cannot even address their arguments.

And she’s not a state politician and had literally no effect on the deal, whereas people like Mike Gianaris, the person who represents that district in the state and was appointed to the board where he could have rejected the deal and stopped it from happening, or Jimmy Van Bramer, who represents the district for the

Oh, dismissing my comment calling you out for being a hypocritical dullard? That’s okay, I can just post it again.

Amazon was a city and state deal that AOC had literally no control over or ability to affect in any way and a significant portion of her constituency is happy is not coming to their neighborhood anyway. You must think her voters are really fucking stupid, huh? They aren’t though. Just you.

Democrats are only a “big tent” because the people running the party insist that they be and that nothing can ever change. Republicans were the exact same way until they forced all those people out of their tent.

Congratulations on being the only person to care about this shit.

You wanna help, pal? Start by going back to Daily Caller where you belong. Oh, and go buy a long hose, attach one end to the tailpipe of your car and put the other end in your mouth.