Why don't you practice what you preach?

I already told you you're the best of the best, dabbler. Move the fuck along.

You're kind of a sanctimonious douche. If I can't congratulate you on being one of a million know-it-all lawyers on Jezebel, can I congratulate you on that? You seem proud of it. Also, no need to school me on lawyering. You dabble in family law so you're the expert, of course, but I still think you are wrong and I…

Congratulations on being a lawyer on Jezebel. I'm one too. I've practiced family law in MA for 7 years. One thing I've learned in divorce is: anything goes. Surrogacy is not an area where jurisprudence is really established in this country and surrogacy is a huge part of their divorce proceedings. Why don't you…

I agree that that is what I would argue as her lawyer but I can't say I think she has a very good case. Essentially, her argument would be "he wanted to have a baby and promised we would be a happy family when what he really meant to do was file for divorce/sole custody once the fetus was viable and leave me in the…

I actually agree with your perspective. I mean, I am happy I was born and raised here (with a few short exceptions living elsewhere) but no state is perfect. I can recognize that while also being like, "I'm impressed with Patrick's quick movement here." Hell, someone's gotta give a big middle finger to the SCOTUS…

I am from proper western MA, lived in central MA for a few years and then in the greater Boston area for 10. So, all over. I get your point but I don't know if an article about MA doing the right thing is a good place to make it.

Well, I've lived in MA for 33 years and never once even seen an abortion clinic protest so if we're dealing with anecdotes, there's mine. I fully support a safe perimeter and will support a new law when drafted but regarding your comment about old lady protestors, here are the ones outside of the Comm Ave place in…

What other states? Where are the states where there are no "scary abortion protests" at all?

Well, to be fair, I think he was joking (he's kind of a funny commenter) and if people reading Jezebel have missed this hot guy criminal, they've been living under a rock.

He's not saying that guy was a John. Just that society seems to value looks to the point of excusing crimes. Many people have overlooked this guy's criminal offenses because he's attractive. He's just an example for the point Penabler is trying to make.

When you have a baby, it seems like miles.

Nonetheless, his 10" are pretty useless on the average woman. Couple that with 7+" around and I'd still be running for the hills. I hope he gets his jollies from getting the fisting crowd off because something tells me he won't get them from typical sex, which would probably be a very shallow experience for him.

Oh, I didn't mean to suggest you think it'll get to 10. More that this guy was already over-endowed and is sort of an idiot for choosing more length if he thinks it'll attract women. Maybe for a circus act but nothing else.

Length, even at most aroused, comes out at about 4 and 3 quarter inches. It's not just an anecdote. It's the findings of actual research. There are obviously exceptions to this research. Some studies have shown a rare woman with a 7" vagina. But it likely won't go to 10. It would be incredible for it to go…

No one is challenging the Constitution. It's that simple. They are merely using it to defend/promote their arguments. No one is going to introduce a ridiculous amendment like what you've written above. You wrote there were only two ways to change this ruling-another case brought to the court or an amendment. I'll…

That's not the same as it being a Constitutional issue. Like I said, the Constitution wasn't being challenged. A law was being challenged. It's hard for me to explain but also, the idea of changing the Constitution to include "bodily autonomy" is comical and would open a enormous can of worms. In addition to that,…

Actually, that's not true. While the court used the Constitution, and in this case, the RFRA, to decide this case, it was an attack on the healthcare law. So, perhaps another case down the line could challenge the precedent here but it's really only necessary to change the law, specifically Obamacare. It's not just…

What she's doing is pretty insane but who hires someone as a live in nanny with no experience and with only a reference from a friend? They don't deserve this, nor do their children but with all the terrible nanny stories out there to pick from-Christ, practice a little caution when you hire one.

It's wishful thinking. I've read about studies and they always involve farm raised children who are exposed to exponentially more bacteria than typical children so it's basically impossible to pinpoint why they have lesser rates of allergies. As for anecdotal evidence-well, anecdotal means crap to me as the mother…