Kawhi might be the most complete basketball player of his generation. He really is a better version of Scotty Pippen...his length and floor spacing, his athleticism, hitting long range.

See Elijah Wood in The Maniac. It’s such a bizarre film and he’s really good.

Ugh.

How much did they pay you to right this article? I’m seriously just asking. I doubt you’ll read this and tell me, but I’m so curious as to what the gawker websites pay their people to post articles like this.
What are the qualifications? The ability to type? Are you able to support yourself with this gig? I’m just…

Yeah but can she make a ham sandwich if nobody is around to yell at her?

There’s literally nothing misguided about her remarks. What, she needed to ask the post-grad jezebel writers what they thought first? I hate shit like this.

It’s not my argument...I just don’t have anything else to add except that. I moved on.

Borg was not better than Fed on clay, and Nadal would have murdered him.

Just as an exercise: If you (or me, whoever) were really good at something like running. Let’s say we began taking it seriously at the age of 35, whereas the past ten years you’d reached your full potential. Does that mean, at age 35, you’re in your prime?

I would 1000% be surprised if that happened, becuase it doesn’t happen. Your skills of speed, agility, hand/eye coordination, power...these don’t get better with age. Unless you’re taking some PEDs.

You guys are missing the key point of this article, which is the word “Prime.” Someone show me an example of a player (those exceptions I didn’t name) that extended their skill set AT their prime INTO their 30s. Show me the list. And no, playing well and succeeding into their 30s does not qualify as Prime.

Your Stan Wawrinka example is very funny. Just fyi. That dude had to wait for the two best players of all time (certainly on clay) began to deteriorate in order to get that high. Also, giving two examples doesn’t qualify as some sort of “new age” for tennis players. Please.

I’m replying to myself now!

Prime vs. playing into your 30s are two very different things. The only players to play into their 30s and still be in their primes are: Federer, Serena, Sampras (he barely qualifies), Navratilova (again, barely qualifies).

Prime in the early 30s happens for the few great players in the game. That’s it. Noboby outside about 5 players has this happened to. Ever.

He’s 25. lmao. Baby Fed. Yeah, ok.

I really don’t see the difference between deadspin articles and Rick Rielly articles. I’m not sure why I read anything online, ever, anymore. It’s all become the same thing.

It’s hard to keep up that kind of energy when you’ve got to consistently cover the recievers for about 7 seconds every play. Rodgers is so much better than any qb I’ve ever seen. It’s unfair. He’d have 5 Super Bowl rings if not for that shit can of an offense they keep giving him. His recievers are average at best.

He’s a total d-bag. I feel for you. At least you don’t root for a team coached by Bill O’Brien though. So I can’t talk too much shit.

#justinbieberwasontheboattoo