Weird ... not necessarily.

Over?

If they oppose you less often than the other viable option, you’ve won more than you would have won otherwise.

It’s not faith man it’s a realistic understanding of the electoral politics of Maine and of the quirky way in which Lisa Murkowski ascended to power in Alaska.

The response, when you boil it all down is basically that you just gotta believe more in the power of progressive ideals and then *poof* nativists will be more likely to vote for you!

who, aside from a few pundits and journalists, still truly believes that “moderate” Republicans like Collins and Murkowski are going to do anything to stymie the GOP’s SCOTUS agenda when every single piece of evidence points to exactly the opposite?

Which, as discussed previously, may not necessarily include former President Obama himself.

Is he good buddies with Joe Crowley and/or Pelosi/other establishment Democrats who dislike her?

Dork.

Do we know that Jones’ did that though? I guess I sort of question whether he did without some sort of evidence that is the case.

His statement implied that protesting at all was wrong.

I was pretty clear that this isn’t the worst thing that’s ever happened. Prescott’s not a “failure” and he shouldn’t be “discarded”.

We (people that aren’t neo-nazis) don’t ask why Jewish people didn’t rise up against Hitler. Assholes are assholes and victims are victims. it’s unreasonable to demand proof that Dak was ordered to toe the line.

But Dak Prescott is no different than the man who cuts off his dreadlocks to comply with his company dress code. He is no different than the ones who say nothing when someone in the boardroom makes a slightly bigoted joke.

Oh come on now Max I know you’re a contrarian but you’re not typically a dumb contrarian.

The only way I can make any sense of Splinter’s editorial tilt on Russia’s election interference and the ongoing investigation is through a very cynical prism.

I don’t think Valve is trying to build a “sustainable” eSport in the sense being discussed here.

The other problem with that is that the clear intent at the time that was written was that”People” meant white landowing males.

Civilized human beings shouldn’t hit other civilized human beings.

As in 2016, by uniting users under a shared identity, the accounts hoped to to capitalize on political divides and later target users with lies closer to the election. One such example from 2016 are posts (shared on Twitter and Facebook) telling social media users they can vote from home or via text for Democratic…