1%? I don’t know that’s an incredibly stupid question.

I would agree that the author has a salient point and certainly Scorcese is not above criticism. However, it is those unnecessary shots and downright boneheaded statements that ruin what could have been a thoughtful take on the tension between art and commerce.

The Color of Money is not a terrible film by any stretch of the imagination. That comment alone calls into question the judgment of this author on matters of cinema. Just a lot of unnecessary Scorcese hate in this article. At one point he appears to unfavorably compare Scorcese to Chazelle which again is nuts. It…

I think the point was that wookie does not do really well with reading comprehension.

I love Terrance Howard but he has his own history of domestic abuse allegations so that wouldn’t exactly address the problem with Majors in that role.

Who Will Save Your Soul?!

I would agree with you on that if anything reported on their custody case and relationship came from a reliable source. With the exception of their joint comments and reporting on the actual court documents this is all just tabloid news.

Why do you feel the need to be on anyone’s side?

If I have a neckbeard am I automatically part of the neckbeard lobby? Who organized it and are there dues?

The CGI was terrible. The movie would have been better if it tried to do less and just be funny.

The cast was the best thing about the movie. They are all very talented and the chemistry was there. It was conceptually flawed and then the director failed to execute.

Not really. There was some improv but the pacing was much tighter in the original.

A all female version of Wrath of Khan would be cool. Let’s make some phone calls!

People didn’t like the movie before it even came out.

Right, I said “progressive posturing” because the posturing is the problematic part. Not the legitimate care that goes into addressing social issues with sensitivity.

No it was honest question. I realize that “woke” has been adopted by the public the same way that “fake news” has. If find it annoying that people have glommed onto it and was asking if there was a better way to discuss it. Unfortunately, its one of those subjects that people have no capacity to have a reasoned…

It doesn’t sound anything like that and I am sure women from different eras and backgrounds will have widely different opinions about what is ok and what is not.

Wow that was really insightful. I think you may have posted on the wrong site.

Was that a joke? I started snickering but then realized it might not have been a mom joke.

I agree its tiresome but what is  a better word to describe this overly sensitive approach to socio-political issues and doubling down on identity politics? Did I even get that description right?