kimokawaii
kimokawaii
kimokawaii

omg shut the fuck up and get out, peter

wow this is bad.

i worked at a fashion magazine as a styling assistant, and i was shocked at the quality of the dolce looks when they came in. i knew they were samples that had been schlepped from shoot to shoot, but the clothing itself was poorly constructed, flimsy, and lacking weight. same with prada also, although prada was a bit

the eyes on the hats are dumb. too much.

dont know him either, but looked at his instagram profile and the poetry he writes, which he appears to be famous for (in addition to being a kushner), is incredibly bad, cringeworthy, like so embarrassing. about as deep as a toilet bowl and just as shitty. insipid, bleghhhhhhh.

fuck her

no utada hikaru song for this installment?

slimy is the exact word for these...SLIMEBALLS! fuck aaaaallllll of these holy fuckheads.

vetements knock-off

Texas: Where the Ol’ West Ain’t So Ol’

these people are actual lunatics. miami is sinking because of climate change and this is what they believe to be important/real/worthwhile. it’s some kind of sickness, viral. i’m having trouble comprehending. i get i’m a subject of interpellation in the althusserian sense, as mostly everyone is, but they’re fucking

#twincest

maybe you’re responding to the wrong person because i was arguing about ownership over narrative and story in a situation where the maker of this art installation is of the same racial group as the historical participants of the atrocities committed against native peoples. my needing to explain the playground bit

the art piece is in response to white american imperialist/colonialist violence and genocide against non-whites, so i don’t see how ownership over telling a story applies here. in other cases, maybe, but this was a white artist responding to violence committed by white peoplefor the sake of national hegemony and

ughhhh stop being so withholding!!!!!!!

NoOnesPost original response to you is indicative of low-level (if any) reasoning and argumentation. unless NoOnesPost is indigenous, then you can use their “logic” to argue—in the same way they were sarcastically and petulantly implying—that their opinion is completely irrelevant to this case also. if you’re not

see, NoOnesPost is what you would call a poseur, they sound off concise and sarcastic phrases in an attempt to sound smart and humorous and above-it-all, when what they are actually being is lazy and insecure. they lurk in these parts.

i agree, and i think of it in a much larger context of whites eliminating or downplaying slavery and genocide against indigenous people from historical narrative.

what kind of argument is this? when there needs to be open and intentional conversation about identity, narrative, race, history, this kind of childish retort is so counterproductive and infuriating.

wow, thanks for that wonderfully insightful contribution