They don’t bother me. It’s misrepresentative or inaccurate ones that do.

Woohoo, vibrant and fun!

Kaepernick does deserve some flak though, both for his hair and for his refusal to vote in 2016.

I was just enjoying the new header image, instead of the old smackable photo of Dan they used to put atop this feature.. but then Dan compensated with that incredibly obnoxious answer to HISBUM. Good work, I guess.

Oh, touché! And there there’s nothing disingenuous at all about your “What, us? Using a debatably accurate headline to drive ad revenue? Well, I never!” reaction.

But it makes for sexier headlines. Therefore clicks, therefore ad revenue, so who gives a crap if it’s likely, accurate, or even true at all?

So it’s pretty clear the “racist hotel” thing is total b.s. I know this is just Jezebel and we shouldn’t expect much, but screw you for publishing this unsubstantiated sensationalist crap.

Not familiar with them, but you’re saying that’s worse than liking Nickelback, Limp Bizkit, Alien Ant Farm, and the Kardashians?

...as should anyone who has seen him perform.

That seems predicated on the entirely reasonable assumption that UK audiences are a bit more discriminating than U.S. ones.

But I eat at Burger King ‘cause I’m not Herb!

Well, that has nothing to do with it. It’s about your very flawed definition of privilege.

Shhhh! Clarity might interfere with our delicious online outrage and sweet clicks!

RAAAAH, I AM SO ANGRY THAT SOMEONE DOESN’T LIKE A BAND I LIKE, I MUST RAGE AT STRANGERS ON TEH INTERNET!

Takes more than this has, evidently.

Oh screw you, AV Club. This is basic j-school stuff: you don’t take one person’s unsubstantiated story and write it as fact (even if it’s deliciously sensational clickbait).

No, it’s more commonly known as “not remembering every interaction you have with another human, especially if it was 10 years ago.”

Anyone seen The Survivalist? That has some intense plant-jizzing in it.

Lol, try reading it again.

Well... they’re not wrong.