War Zone is over-the-top amazingness.

Hear hear. It's one of those shitty twists that you can't see coming because it's logically impossible within that story. The same reason I hate The Sixth Sense.

No, it looks so bizarre that I am kinda reluctant.

No. Those movies obviously have different stories, but there are a lot of other elements that make them comparable. But these directors are in totally different genres and tones.

Ha, I initially read that more like "Byat-min," and was loving the idea of John Malkovich from Rounders playing Batman.

I know, I'm only ranking what I've seen. And I have skipped it thus far because I don't know WTF to make of it.

Weird take. They're far too different to compare.

Spielberg's post-2000 output really drops him down my list. There are a couple of good ones in there, but they've largely been such garbage. War Horse actually made me mad.

If you're a Nolan fan, yes. That's a pretty standard knock, along with the stupid "his movies are not as smart as they think are they are" zingers.

I do not get the snarkiness over the Batvoice. If you're trying to mask your voice you can either:
- Go high
- Go low
- Do an accent

Short career so far, but Denis Villeneuve has made some brilliant movies.

As long as we're disqualifying people for one film, let's lose Cronenberg for Existenz

Then De Palma made Mission to Mars, Snake Eyes and Bonfire of the Vanities. I don't think Nolan will sink that low.

Following doesn't rank?

Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976? If these trends continue.. ehhhh!

It's supposed to be.

Although I forgot to say that yes, you're right, I am sure there are plenty of "Bernie Bros" (that phrase is new to me, but I think I know what it means) celebrating this.

I can't tell if you didn't understand my answer or I'm just too sleep-deprived, but that doesn't seem to make a lot of sense.

I'm very pleased to see one of those studies was written by a woman. So:

BREAKING: 24-year-old movie about resurrected dinosaur theme park may not be scientifically accurate