Excellent. Your citation emphasizes the folly of expecting reliable information in any article. One must pursue knowledge beyond casual Internet reading. The article itself didn’t state that the eight apple cultivars listed were the ONLY cultivars analyzed. This American Chemical Society link, from the article, DOES: h…

My observation is maybe an obvious one. Arguing back and forth among readers is less effective than simply reading more about the subject. Even the article is unreliable because it does not say that the ONLY apples analyzed were eight varieties (cultivars) that are grown in Ontario, Canada...and of course in other…

One might ask if the article itself holds water. The study only analyzed eight cultivars grown in Ontario, Canada. None other. The article omits that precise information, but it gives the American Chemical Society hyperlink. That page tells what the article did not. Besides, ranking an apple based solely on…

The article doesn’t say, but if you click its link to The American Chemical Society, you’ll see they only analyzed eight apple cultivars that are grown in Ontario, Canada: Red Delicious, Northern Spy, Ida Red, Cortland, Golden Delicious, McIntosh, Mutsu, and Empire. None other. The article title, not exactly accurate,…

Unfortunately, the article’s title and contents are misleading. They omit (or obscure) some significant information about the analytical study. I have two issues of courteous criticism: First, MANY apple cultivars were not part of the American Chemical Society analysis. If you simply click the “American Chemical…