No fools i can agree on, however, they are a member of NATO which makes buying american sort of mandatory...

He’s going to thedrive.com as of 4/15.

The story continues, just a new venue!

Thanks man! No they did not brain wash me!

And you are correct about the communications advancements.

No, I read it. You just seem to think that the data transmission issues are much more complicated than I do. I don’t discount that they are an issue, I just think they are solvable. If there is a significant tactical advantage to using these remotely operated tanks, the tech will catch up to the need.

Yeah, whether the Russians figured this out or not, Tyler is clearly missing the forest for the trees on this one. He’s envisioning a C2 challenge on the scale of controlling a regiment of these things, when in reality you’re looking at only controlling a handful in the highest-risk situations.

This is the article Tyler went full **** .

Assuming you can handle the data transmission issue then your situational awareness is exactly that of a modern tank which has cameras all around and doesn’t require an easily sniped commander out of the hatch. If a drone aircraft can be handled in Afghanistan from a base in Nebraska than a tank can be handled from 50…

I’m not missing shit. They want you to believe that. If you go as hard as Russia does, then they think twice about fucking with you.

they been bombing russia lately?

There can be no doubt that modern air wars cannot be fought on the cheap—well, unless you’re Russia.

“

No.

“...lifter”

Putin is giving western analysts and military experts brain contusion with his foreign policy moves. The pullout took EVERYONE by surprise.

The difference is that China controlled the sea for thousands of continuous years, all the way up until the 1800s.

Thanks for not being an ignorant fool and for looking at both sides of the story.

The Marshal Ustinov leaving Hampton Roads, 1989