kg386
kg386
kg386

This isn't a matter of opinion or interpretation, but rather of reading comprehension. The sentence is communicating the author's bewilderment at a bunch of dudes being "so bad at not being the worst". Ie. being bad at being in any way good. Her bewilderment means that she doesn't generally think groups of dudes are

"counter sexism"

WHO WILL THINK OF THE MEN?

Also, so far, those women are imaginary. Seriously. People! Don't use imaginary people who just happen to agree/support your point. (I'm not really talking about you, but I have a feeling the point I made to superstarmacgee about using imaginary people is going to not be discussed.) All those women wanting it all? Who

It's true! I don't know why all these imaginary examples are having problems! You should ask them!

WASHINGTON — In response to the passage of a law in the state of Pennsylvania banning the touching of women's pregnant stomachs, the GOP has officially announced its "take back your freedom to grope people because freedom" campaign.

That can't possibly be the norm. If it was the norm, no one would have commented on it. The fact that you can point to it as "a thing," disproves its putative normative status.

This is kind of a silly article and should be retitled "motherhood: the magical cure for everything, apparently". But really I came here to tell commenters that is unbelievably rude to ask about the kind of contraception she was using. How or why this baby came to be is no ones business, so seriously gtfo. So many

Why did you feel that a "nerdy smile" and "sweet personality" should earn you a "beautiful girl?" Why would it not be a 1:1 ratio, where those qualities would logically attract a girl with similar sweet and nerdy qualities? It seems like that statement doesn't make sense, as your stated qualities and the qualities

....well now I just want to make out with all these doodz

Attention commenters: this piece is not about white women stealing braids from black women because black women had them first. It's about the NYT writer being an idiot and subbing "white women" in for "all women." You are still allowed to braid your hair.

All the gifs in the sidebar need to go! So so distracting and irritating!

YES!!! Ferf*cksake, enough already! IF i wanted to see that crap, I would have seen that crap by now. You're losing me, Jez.

This has nothing to do with this article, but can you take the goddamn Miley Cyrus gif out of the sidebar, please? I'm at work and would like to actually read some of the articles where it keeps popping up.

Hint: In case you don't know history: Pretty much every society was a matriarchal society and had mystic cults based around fertility and female goddesses until settled agricultural engendered a division of labor that made women primarily responsible for the home. Male gods started to become revered as a result and an

I think I'm already there.

My new favorite is this:

Sometimes I wish Jez would provide a few resources with posts like these.

I kinda hate the implication that if a dude has limited resources or a criminal record, he's automatically a douchebag. Some of those "bad boys" can be real sweethearts.