keykayquanehamme
Quique Munners
keykayquanehamme

Awesome. Thanks.

This... aged.

Put yourself in her shoes: The original explanation for this show was basically Wanda and Vision live inside classic sitcoms. And Vision isn’t dead any more because... reasons. If she wasn’t a hardcore comic book fan, it makes perfect sense that she was confused before she read the script. And even afterward, it still

I don’t even understand why people feel it was misleading. The only way it would be is if someone needs to take “it” and expand it to literally the entire existence of the show. And if you’re going to do that, Agatha didn’t kill Vision. Agatha didn’t take his body to a lab. Agatha didn’t experiment on his body or try

Thought experiment: What if the thing that’s wrong here is... you being extremely online? I’m not trying to negate your experience or your feelings. I’m not trying to say that you don’t have a right to your own opinions and experiences. So let’s set that aside and just examine what you wrote from a different

I guess the conversation that’s happening here seems, to my mind, a little disingenuous... Society is (and should be) having a reckoning with how we treat women. Society is (and should be) having a reckoning with how we treat celebrities. But we should be honest about all of it. So if you can see the line between “Tar

I guess I just struggle to see it as self-deprecating. [And again, I like Conan and I think he’s hilarious. I think his approach as a host is great in a lot of ways: Delivery, timing, willingness to be self-deprecating, willingness to make his guest comfortable by making himself the butt of a joke, willingness to turn

I think this lands in the gap between intent and impact, though... “Self-mocking” may have been the intent. “Mean-spirited towards the guest” may not have been the intent. There may not have even been a single guest who was bothered by it... But the impact was, in part, normalizing this behavior for his audience. Dave

Who’s the “rich person” in this story? I’m guessing whoever you point to this is going to be very confused...

Stop wishing and do it. You can probably use technology you already have and get the rest at Staples for under $300. You could record it all on a free DAW. Toss in another $100 and you could include booze and White Castle for the recording session and the mixing and mastering sessions. Hell, depending on what you

The Do Makes are fantastic. They’re neither math rock nor incompetent jazz.

Not sure if you’ve watched any old Conan segments with female guests lately, but Conan had some cringeworthy moments too... I was in the “like Conan’s sense of humor/don’t watch a lot of late night” category for many years, and was firmly “Team Coco” when it came to the Leno/NBC stuff, so I’m not saying this

Including David Letterman, right?

I’m not even sure I’m okay with a light-hearted interview.

Look at it like this: If CNN wants to interview the governor of the State of New York - as governor - then they don’t need Chris Cuomo for that occasion. They have 23 hours of every day (and 24 hours on Saturday and Sunday), plus that 24th hour every day that

Please keep that feeling in mind and then read this, paying particular attention to the date:

Your comment is definitely how “obtuse” works now.

I will never stop being shocked to hear lawyers - a group of people with a reputation for liking money - arguing against a mechanism where people who aren’t even directly involved in their cases can contribute money to the people that ARE directly involved in their cases. It would be like a rat running for mayor on a

It’s “Who killed Davey Moore?” right?

Some people aren’t getting paid by check at all. Some people will receive $1400 via direct deposit, after having received $600 by direct deposit. Are you suggesting that those people should also be outraged because they didn’t receive a check at all? Or are you willing to accept that if you’re going to take “$2000

They’re not confused by this. They’re being dishonest about it.