Is it though? I think guys who hit their wives should get into a lot of trouble but it’s not like Vick went to a dogfight once. He was effectively involved in organized crime.

He got his break. He paid his debt according to the court, and I’m good with that. He doesn’t belong in prison, but that doesn’t erase the horrific things he did. Fuck him.

Killing animals is an unforgivable sin. He should have had the foresight to murder someone instead.

I’m OK with him getting his chance to get back in the league. He paid for what he did, but if it’s between him and a similarly talented person for a backup QB role, I’m going with the guy without sociopathic tendencies.

Very dumb trade, but that doesn’t make bringing in the dog torturer/maimer/murderer in for a last chance a good decision.

44-for-60 for 371 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT in 5 games (3 starts) for the Steelers in 2015.

Is the idea of civility a foreign concept these days? Does everyone have to be either an asshole or your BFF in public? Hell no! Keep it civil, folks. Now, good day to you. I said, Good Day!

Interesting that she skipped Nixon, because she really sounds like his kind of gal.

Came here to say this. That’s... quite a trajectory. A distillation, really. Take anything that was coherent and sensical about Goldwater, boil it away, and you’re reduced to Reagan. Take that and spin it down, and you’ve got a hard lump of stupid named George W. Bush. Take that and burn it in a crucible, and you’ve…

The Party of Personal Responsibility, y’all.

By the same argument, she is saying that everyone on the left is an egg-throwing psychopath.

From far away, the sound of idiocy can be misunderstood as hope

I keep seeing different self important declarations like these about how someone assuming the person supports Trump was the last straw to push that person over to support him. What they are really saying is they know it’s socially reprehensible to go along with some of the more extreme ideals and are looking for an…

I think you maybe missed the point of her op-ed which was, succinctly, that she has chosen to embrace an ignorant, self-obsessed charlatan of a political figure because someone threw an egg at her once.

Yes I believe the appropriate nomenclature would be that she was pre-chickened

It seems hypocritical to keep referring to it as an egg and not a chicken.