Good lord, can the AV Club people just stop being the redundant arbiters of smug, humorless wokeness? Can you just talk about something that’s happening without trying to do a call back to ye olden days of six months ago when you could justify any (well deserved but lazy) trash-talk about Trump? Anyway, this looks…

If I thought Amazon Prime Day was so bleak, I would feel kind of conflicted writing for a website that derives a large stream of revenue from Amazon. But that’s just me.

So it’s OK now for actors to portray characters that don’t resemble their fictional couterparts? If Woody Harrelson wants to play Luke Cage or Wesley Snipes wants to be James Bond, I see nothing wrong with that.

There was a hardcore album allegedly done by a parrot years ago called “HATEBEAK”...and while Tico appears legit, there was a very verbose parrot on Johnny Carson years ago that was uncanny responding to questions. I ‘m 99% sure it was really just a ventriloquist act.

I have more issues with using quotation marks in this context.

“Real” is complicated. They are not actors performing scenes from a script but they're not improvising either.

More interesting than the actual article but also irrelevant. The vintage lenses were not likely the source of the errant pixels. And the pixels could have been easily noticed (and corrected) during Netflix’s extensive Quality Control process. My theory is this was intentional on Snyder’s part. Why? I have no idea.

It’s a weird landscape out there that’s almost impossible to navigate with any degree of certainty. Thankfully, a guy promoting a book and someone trying to generate clicks have figured out how we need to behave from now on.

He acknowledges his lack of intelligence often.

Hoo-Ha! She’s got a GREAT ASS!

The stage version of “Fleabag” was streaming on the National Theater website for $4 a year ago.

In just three minutes, a bunch of kids telegraphed more genuine, enlightened outrage than three years of the “woke” faux-sincere click-bait that passes for political discourse here.

I don’t think he’s “apolitical” but he’s spread pretty wide across the political “spectrum.”

Because it’s entertaining.

It’s entertainment. We don’t get to pick what people like to listen to.

I think that’s close to what makes Rogan interesting. He’s pretty up front about not knowing what the hell he’s talking about. He’s all over the map when it comes to political dogma and doesn’t seem to have a partisan axe to grind. Sometimes, that’s a good thing. Other times, not so much.

Actually three if you count the awesomeness of the teevee movie with Bill Gates played by...Anthony Michael Hall!

Kermit had some shoddy seams. Statler and Waldorf were pretty good.

Yeah, I don’t buy the article’s contention about the microwave failing to perk up a biscuit. Maybe 30 seconds is too long. It is for my nuke box.

Oh man, listen to the uber-woke AV Club writer trying to wrap his mind around this one!