Actually, it depends. In Pennsylvania, for instance, we have statutory sexual assault as the statutory rape provision has been repealed. That says

I don’t need to know that. I presented the case based upon the facts that you presented. You seem overly worried that some stranger thinks that something you did was hypocrisy.

I don’t have to find you anything. It’s your second and third statement that shows your distinct inability to think. Assuming that there are no non-black people writing on this blog, you leap to “they only want to associate with blacks”. Do you think that is good reasoning? I think you are making a very poor…

You see it as not volunteering to pay extra taxes on money that you have inherited. I see it as a choice between that and rethinking your stance on the policy. Perhaps considering the situation and that the money is necessary for you to live a better life, you would actually consider progressive taxation or some phase…

Mine does near quitting time for me sometimes...

Nah, the rules were that only one player gets it, not his team.

I agree with that. A moral failing due to weakness is not necessarily hypocrisy. It is in a different category. You conveniently ignore the caveat that I stated in your simplification.

You make some pretty poor assumptions.

I don’t have to prove anything. You made the statement. Perhaps you would like to prove your point rather than foisting the “hard work” of thinking onto someone else.

Yes, that is called hypocrisy. If you oppose these things, then you don’t do it because you might be a little better off. It’s called standing on principle. And principles are not free. There is a difference between moments of weakness too. All people make mistakes in ways that go against what they believe. Instead,…

Yes, you are a hypocrite if you take a cash rebate that you don’t believe in. That everyone else is doing it or you had to originally pay into it does not allow you to avoid hypocrisy. Principle is not free. You are trying to make it free for you by saying that you can benefit from something while arguing against it.…

Exactly. Lahren is a Coulter wannabe, without doing any of the work or education that Coulter has done to get to her current position. I despise Coulter though. I pity Lahren more than I despise her. She’s almost too stupid to hate.

Your post seems rather racist here.

Brian St. Pierre was far worse than Landry Jones. Also, QB wins are a silly stat considering that Roethlisberger in relief game and the Arizona game where Vick had 6 yards passing in the first half only to be benched for Jones.

That is a valid response. Sometimes you surprise me. Good day.

“That dog don’t hunt here”

People with a brain call your statement moving the goalposts.

I am content.

Marketing a drink as a cure for cancer is not harmful? Tell that to the desperate people who tried it, some of whom may have done so while limiting their involvement with traditional medicine/treatments.

The third year would be higher than that. A third tag pays the greater of 144% or top 5 player contract, meaning bell would get top 5 QB money