no they are not. A site that collects studies are not selling anything.

says the person who blindly accepts claims made by discredited scientists, bad studies, using russian propaganda sites and anti-gm/pro organic lobbyist groups.

“I have been repeatedly saying, there just isnt enough evidence to say it is safe or unsafe. But there is evidence that GMO farming has so many side effects that will only cause problems in future.”

10 year study by the European Comission. That is as far removed from “industry” as you can get.

There is no maybe or maybe not. RT.com is a Russian propaganda site to promote Putin and his regime. Your “source” is known for pushing various conspiracy theories, including 9/11 truth, Obama Birther theories, and various climate change conspiracy theories (its completely funded by the Russian Government).

bwhaha, annecdotal claims are not evidence. Provide the case number , state and the entity involved, and the charges

the only one showing their ignorance on this subject is you.

No, Sid, this is your desperation. trying to defend an indefensible position. Just admit that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about, because its very apparent that you don’t.

and where do you think the cost of the labeling will be passed on to?

Oh look you are using the tobacco industry hoax advertisments as your justification. Sorry, but the Surgeon General was telling everyone that cigarettes were bad for you BACK Then!

These companies claim that the world is in shortage of food, and GMO solves that problem. NONSENSE. There are people dying of hunger, TRUE. BUT, that is not because food production is short; that is because food is wasted and not distributed the way it can be, and then multiple other political, economical and other…

In just one post you just comitted several logical fallacies:

I have to atleast try to inform you that all the research studies, tests and papers that are in favour of GMO, are 100% totally funded by the companies that produce them.

Search Lenape Potato. That’s when hybridization goes unchecked and untested.

Thank you for that correction. So Monsanto does allow it, thereby rendering the original claim to be wrong.

Monsanto and DuPont (the two big GMO food players) are extremely shady companies. Monsanto, in particular, has Agent Orange and DDT coupled with multiple government collusion and coverups in their track record.

Or forced

Ruby Red Grapefruits
Texas Red Grapefruits
Bananas
Apples
Pears
Seedless Watermelons
Yams
Rice

Nutfart, everything is made of chemicals. INCLUDING the fucking air you breathe

Glyphosate is less toxic than table salt, you elephant turd. (damn, salt is a chemical!)

WATER is fucking toxic! (oops a fucking chemical!)

YOU are made of fucking chemicals. YOU produce several TOXIC chemicals (formaldehyde and ammonia to…

You are using it dismiss my argument. By pulling the shill gambit fallacy you are dismissing anything that goes against your bias

so correcting misinformation is “obsession” to you? Since when?

When I see something that is patently wrong, I correct it.

They surely sue family farmers. Farmers who buy commodity seeds (without a cotnract w/ monsanto) and re-plant. What they do is compeltely within their rights, but I still find it shady. Cross-politnation very well may be a myth (and according to their site it is a myth), but them suing family farmers out of business…