This case will probably be erotically tied up in the appeals process for a couple more years.

I don’t understand this.

I’m just looking forward to the Hillary stans managing to blame this on ‘Bernie Bros’

The patience is something I am still working on, admittedly. Most of the marginalization of Sanders supporters is just a deflection to avoid having to take a long, hard look at what Clinton’s negative campaigning and policies are really saying about her, but I have been a Jez reader from the very beginning, and it’s…

Yeah, and people wonder why we get frustrated over being effectively erased from the discussion with one snide dismissal, every single time Bernie gets brought up around here. This isn’t how liberals are supposed to debate among themselves.

Pragmatism used to be the bromide that centrist Republicans would always prescribe. It is the rightward slide of the GOP that has dragged “liberals” to that point of the spectrum. What Sanders advocates is not impossible, it is not even radical by pre-Reagan standards. So I find it very depressing to hear the drumbeat…

ETA: Decided not to get into some stupid trollfight today.

I don't even know why I come on here anymore. The first comment on every article always throws out Bernie Bros. It's ridiculous.

Hey, I’m just grateful you didn’t dismiss me entirely. It’s okay to stay comfortably inside your own narrative, but don’t be surprised if women like me push back against the dismissive sexism I see from a surprising number of Clinton supporters. It’s not helping anything and simply driving a bigger wedge between the…

Now you’re moving the goalposts. If no one can work with republicans, why not elect someone with true progressive ideals instead of a moderate?

I’m not sure what you think is going to happen when you post a very debatable opinion on the Internet, of all places, and then finish it up by inflaming people with that sexist Berniebro garbage. Baiting people to anger as an excuse to bolster your “Berniebro” narrative is not exactly responsible debating.

My question…

Clinton doesn’t know how to work the system, she personifies the system, as in fitting effortless into it, while giving the perception that she would fight for the average citizen’s wellbeing, when she’s only interested in upholding the status quo. I’d pick the guy with the great ideas who might win over the public…

That is where I am kind of sitting with this too. It is possible that she just likes the attention she gets from this. But, she could also be trying to escape from or deal with some trauma or emotional issue that is too much for her to deal with as a human, but she can “escape” it as a cat.

“More Electable” shows its head once again... only cause people like you are not willing to break from the pack so you sacrifice your standards so sad really.

Yep, you’re absolutely right. And the system of approved commenters does nothing to help. I’m being hard on him in this particular instance but its really the specific subset of low hanging fruit/name puns/misdirection approved commenters that are constantly on top that drives me nuts.

You like her because she is more electable? Do you have a source on that?

Are you seriously an undecided voter? What’s keeping you from making a decision?

I’d be more interested in how she reconciles her claim to have cat night vision, with the obvious truth that she doesn’t have cat night vision.

If she “speaks cat” then ill pay her to come over and explain to my siamese that the vacuum was not a machine sent back in time to kill him.