Once you truly accept your body you won't have to hide behind costumes.
Once you truly accept your body you won't have to hide behind costumes.
No, the problem is that you think you have the right to determine how a woman can present herself to the wor
Sorry, but you need to stop bettering yourself as it makes other people insecure. Also, please stop educating yourself, you don't want to make other people feel stupid.
Some peoples shaming is other people's motivation. If seeing a fit person in an ad paralyzed you, then you have much bigger issues than taking down the ad will solve.
Americans as a whole weigh more than most Europeans and surprisingly also suffer from much higher rates of heart disease and other weight related disorders. The vast majority of Americans would be healthier if they weighed less. The idea that Americans are too concerned with being skinny is laughable and is resulting…
The fact that you mention that it has more calories than ice cream shows you lack a basic understanding on nutrition.
Ads are inherently manipulative, that’s the fucking point. If they were really concerned about manipulative ads then stop trying to fund their public transportation through advertising.
Except there’s no way it will actually be applied to men. Do you think they’re going to turn down an ad featuring a famous soccer player because they are “too fit”?
Stop victim blaming please...
Stop calling him Maple Jordan, it's one of the worst nicknames conceived in recent history. And if you really feel the nickname should be used, give it to Anthony Bennett, someone who is terrible enough to deserve such a shitty name.
Woah, it’s almost like Hillary is the one who is a progressive and Sanders is stuck in the 60s!
Do you realize Bernie has never messed anything up because he’s never actually had the ability to? Also, do you realize you’re spewing the same bullshit about Clinton that Fox News spoons feeds their audience?
That attitude worked so well in Vietnam and Iraq!
Al Gore won over 75% of votes in the 2000 primary, Clinton is likely to end up with more than Obama had in 2008 and Obama had the greatest general election success since Reagan. So I don’t think your examples have anything to do with how elections actually play out. And if Clinton is so bad, why should anyone support…
You mean because Little Lord Stephen is going to choke again. MVP 51 out of the last 52 weeks!
Lebron James
No, the vast majority of the world doesn't care about your water cooler gossip. And be honest, the only reason you care is that Bill gets more resources than you do.
Dealing with impoverished people from developing countries gives them a sense of power and control over the situation.
Hey guys - simple hack to get more of what you want out of life - be a fucking asshole!
Wow, you really figured out the missing puzzle piece piece of social security funding! Even if the goverment undercharges, there is almost no chance this has a meaningful effect on social security funding.