This... more of this. amazing

To be fair with his history, he likely lied about the premium, lied about filling it up (had someone else do it), lied about driving, lied about it being a car, lied about where he lived and lied about where he went. And he likely first stated it was 8 days a week until someone else changed it to 7.

I mean, he’s right it isn’t customer centric. It’s “I want more profit centric”. If you produce the best product (as in the cars), this might work. But I am one of those people that wouldn’t consider a new car without android auto... so I’ll never find out if their cars would be worth it.

Gulf, check. JPS, check. But no Martini? epic fail.

Sure, you could be right. I just think this will work itself out fairly soon “soon is subjective I suppose”. I think in a few years you’ll see more lower end models coming back. Guess we’ll find out... either way I just thought the headline was too much.

Why? Because all corporations are greedy. Sure, they won’t get as big of a return on lower priced vehicles, but if people buy fewer cars, the car makers will chase volume. They have done this at every opportunity in history.. why would it change now?

This is just silly. The volumes will come back on lower end cars. Inventories are going up from latest reports and sure, automakers want to sell high-margin cars, but they will eventually chase volumes like they always do.

I am sure this is fast as hell, but I always loved that the S2000 had to be absolutely abused to be fast. I’m all for more power, but how about a strengthened NA 4 that revved to 10k and put out about 300 HP. Now that would be a thrill. And yes, I realize if you kept it under 5k rpms it would still be slower than a…

I mean, does you having a good example make Jeeps “reliable”? I have a friend with similar (2016 I believe) Grand Cherokee and she had nothing but problems with that car. I’m pretty sure those 2 examples are useless compared to large amounts of data... which places like Consumer Reports (or others) have shown Jeep as…

Agreed. (I thought of adding more, but think you summed it up).

At this price it should be damn near flawless. The apparent condition puts this 2 or 3 times too expensive. 

This reminds me of what I consider the all-time screw up with naming: When honda/acura ditched the name “Legend”. Seriously, who green lighted that idea?

I mean, I feel like most people call the Range Rover line “Range Rovers” already, and really the Defender crowd seems to do the same (or at least I would hear Land Rover Defender... I don’t just hear “Land Rover”). It’s really just the Discovery line that I hear the Land Rover name all that much, and I doubt that’ll…

Fair, I get your post. But I do have an overabundance of snark... so it has to come out somewhere.

It’s funny you think there were environmental benefits associated with his $500 million personal yacht.

This was me. It is a great alternative to the commuter sedan, but the price puts it against (or near) real sport sedans. Add in that dealer, woof. I’d consider one used at some point though.

Still probably higher odds that from this NASA satellite.

Yeah, as far as stupid articles go, this one is near the top. It’s at least in the top 2,467.

I for one am interested in the sawdust phase... not a lot of people getting in on that one yet. fools I tell ya

Yeah, me too. The Palisade looks like a good truck, but I can’t get over the grill. Personal preference and all, but I think the grill is awful.