Could be, I didn’t drive the 4 cyl model. I truly enjoy this car, it serves my needs very well, but it looks far sportier than it drives.

I have the current TLX, and although the 290 hp V6 is smooth and sounds nice, it is not a performance car. That is partly from the slow shifting 9-speed, but if they make a Type S version of the new model, it definitely needs more than 300 hp.

For all the people on here saying how terrible this is... it’s a wagon, stick, turbo 6.. and not too expensive! I mean, damn near a holy grail around these parts. Is this site now for enthusiasts that can’t turn wrench?

Ok, you will have to double (or triple) this cost from repairs in the next few years.. and it might…

I had a Typhoon, but just sold it last fall... guess I’ll need to update my photo!  (The “Cyclone” is coincidence, I went to Iowa State... not to be confused with a Syclone).  

You are on to something, but I propose a slight update for current trends:

I get that the old face had similarities to the 200, but in what world is the new look a “major improvement”? I guess it has kind of a Subaru look, which is ok I suppose... but I’m not sure it looks better. I’d give it a solid “eh”.

Accurate additions, although wheels could be bigger yet

The Kia’s I’ve seen it is every time the brake is applied.  If it was only under hard braking, I think it’s a decent idea... in this case though it’s just distracting.

Agree with the huge CP on this price, but the Beretta holds some great memories for me since I learned to drive in one. If this was... oh, around $2,500, I think that’d be ok.

I just did this. I was looking at low mileage used cars and ended up getting a new 2019 because of the deal I was able to get. Planning on driving it for many years, so the model year wasn’t as important as you said.

Ah yes, this was my first car. Only no, because I didn’t have the twin cam... I had the base Nova. Let me tell you how exciting this was...

Good point. I know fuel cells are used for back-up generators, but I’m not sure what other applications. 

Maybe so. However, there is a lot of money being spent on battery development, more so than likely ever. I’m not proclaiming the future here, just a guess. Also, my main point is that I believe battery development will exceed the benefits of hydrogen powered vehicles.

I think batteries will improve greatly here soon, to the point where hydrogen won’t have a chance to compete down the road. I have no inside knowledge to this, mostly just guessing here... but basing it on how little real progress has been made to batteries for so long, that I believe real breakthroughs will come as…

I believe the official design language that Nissan used here is called: “unoffensive blobulous”

Agree... sat in the Veloster N recently and it’s just too tight in the back for my family.  The i30 N would be very compelling if it were offered here.

Neutral: Look at a balance sheet... Revenue (customers) is at the top. Shareholder’s profit is at the bottom. Employees, re-investment, etc goes in between. Prioritize in that order. You have nothing without revenue (keep customers happy), you do not operate with employees, you do not grow/improve without…

I have to disagree. Having rented a Maxima last year, it was terrible. Granted, most the the awfulness comes from the CVT, but the feeling of sitting in a bunker, the crappy entertainment system and styling by a blind person didn’t help much. I’ll give you, the door handle materials felt nice when I was frantically…

I like the exercise... although to really go with the sport truck theme, how about a turbo on the 4.0 instead of the 360. 

I hadn’t noticed this before... this is now one of those things I can’t unsee.  It is awful.