Looking at current events, dogs are far smarter than I’m told humans are.

Nope

Bullshit. 

They are the GOODEST OF IDIOTS AND WE STILL DON’T DESERVE THEM THEN IF SCIENCE IS GONNA BE ALL RUDE AND SHIT.

fixed it

We’ll see if the old adage of “a white man will empty his pockets for you if you convince him the coloreds are about to rise” will equally apply to white women.

Evangelical women have been brainwashed to believe their bodies are not their own, so if they are harassed or assaulted, they must have done something to deserve it by tempting men into sin. I recently read a sad article from someone who grew up in an evangelical family, and that’s the sort of stuff they teach them.…

Then we’re all fucked.

You know what has been pissing me off lately?  There is already a remedy in the law for someone making “baseless” accusations which cause you damage.  It’s called suing for defamation.  That has not stopped being an option!  If someone lies and said you did something that you didn’t do, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. …

the accusation is enough to destroy someone’s career and someone’s life

The real disgrace here is that Kelly has presented herself sleevelessly. Let’s focus on what’s important.

Well, see, corporations are people...but not when crimes have been committed!

I read co-sign, I immediately scroll down to pass on advice I got from close family members: NEVER CO-SIGN.

Extortion thy name is collections.

paying it is the easiest way out for us or they’ll get a lawyer to call.

I know this wasn’t in the US, but it sounds like collection agencies there are similar to here. Which is to say: Shady as fuck and not interested in facts.

I mean, I don’t know the law in Canada, but here in the US, companies are usually given a pass for these sorts of actions. A few years ago, there was a woman who had her house mistakenly demolished when the tear-down people got the wrong address. You’d think destroying someone else’s home would be some sort of crime,…

Except for the part where he didn’t cosign anything. I mean he could be lying, but the fact that the bank didn’t produce any proof he co-signed and returned the car strongly suggests that he’s telling the truth.

What? Not even a “Sorry?” I am skeptical of the Canadian-ness of that bank.

If RBC made a mistake I’d call it grand theft auto. Either way I’d like to hear more about this story, especially how his suit against RBC goes. I’d call it news, or at least a story I have interest in.