You know a bunch of snowflakes is an avalanche, right?

They could, but these are Trumpanzee-authoritarians-who-think-they’re-libertarians first, techheads second.

You won. Get over it already. Jesus.

Because threatening to shoot people over internet articles does not make you a snowflake at all.

Were you on the moon the last eight years? People were burning literal effigies of President Obama after he was elected. The tea party freaking stacked Congress in 2010 because the right was so pissed off. The Republicans dogged him on everything they could, but they couldn’t make anything stick. He ran far too tight…

You can live with it, the rest of us sane people trying to save American Democracy are going to do the best we can to make up for sheep like you

It’s a preponderance of neck beards at gizmodo, who can’t understand the basic idea that the policies that are determined by our government can and will affect the gadgets they keep safe under their fedoras.

@gizmodomedia not @gizmodo. @gizmodomedia is the new email handle for all GMG staff members.

Remember how the New York Times was cheerleading for war in Iraq because of all those weapons of mass destruction they had? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Absolutely not. The NYT and Washington Post have shown time and time again that they’re willing to spin or bury leaks in order to curry favor with the government. No PR flacks from the government have that kind of pull with Gizmodo, and you can rest assured that Gizmodo won’t rat you out to its government contacts for…

Yeah where is my iPhone news. Fuck that fascist guy ruining our country that’s possible compromised by Russian intelligence. Cover Ouya again!

I also think it’s strange that the gizmo people are unhappy since there have been some legitimate technical aspects to this whole mess: hacking, private servers, unsecured cellphones, flashlight app capabilities, bugging/phone tapping- these all seem like things that could legitimately belong in a tech or political…

Maybe don’t click on things you don’t want to read?

Some confusion comes from the new name of the company- Gizmodo Media Group, which all the old gawker sites fall under. Plus the Gizmodo comments are the worst (there’s no best) when it comes to comments of “You got politicks in my Gizmo news I’m audi”. Then you have Trump supporters who are super feral and legally…

saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafe spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace

Wait, so you “calls it as you sees it” but think that it’s just biased to say Trump is a disaster? So by your logic, to be unbiased you have to never criticize the fucked up shit he’s doing? WHAT?!

The greys here are pretty fun to look at.

“I’m as anti-Trump as can be, but let’s just let him fuck everything up without questioning any of it for the next four years.”

This was posted to specialprojectsdesk.kinja.com, and then cross-posted...

Just where is “here” this is not coming from Gizmodo, but from Special Projects Desk