Ooohhh, good call. I think it’s a toss up between “he talked to Jesus and Jesus is okay with it, so we should all be too” and “this is a lie from the deep state heathens on the left who have every judge in the country bought and paid for, something something BENGHAZI HUNTERS LAPTOP CHINA”.

Or his go to misogyny. The jury was made up of ugly bitter women.

Oh I've already heard the excuses on this one. "she clearly wanted it" "she's lying or she would have gone to the police" "it was so long ago, it doesn't matter now" and of course "fake news!"

Oh, they will. You can bet on the “Jesus forgives” campaign to begin any day now. 

It’s fucking gobsmacking isn’t it?

And millions of people, including many women, will STILL vote for him.

5 bucks he spins this as an attack from the left within 24 hours.

This was my knee-jerk reaction as well... that we live in a world where we have to make a distinction between “rape” and “sexual abuse.”

okay, christians, let see you spin this one for jesus!

And even some of them said she sucks and you shouldn't believe her!

The patients who testified against Elizabeth Holmes are on public record. The NYTimes did not bother to interview them for this “unbiased” profile sourced by her family and friends. What a joke.

No, it is weird and fitting for the New York Times to produce a ham fisted profile for people who like to pretend that they are clever. The article was no more than a bad “on one hand and on the other hand” college essay. It is in no way relevant that she is a mother. That she cares for her dog does not give any…

“I worked my way through a list of Ms. Holmes’s friends, family and longtime supporters, whom she and Mr. Evans suggested I speak to.”

At some point we may have to grapple with the fact that the Gray Lady has more than a few long standing flaws.

It’s amazing what little research the NY Times author put behind her article other than speaking with “Friends of Liz Holmes” (which sounds like a PAC running ads).

You can almost hear the money being transferred from her account to the ny times

Also the elective surgery was apparently to correct a sunken chest, so he basically got breast augmentation to look more masculine, which is a form of gender affirming care he so vehemently opposes for others.

It’s worth adding that the references to gloves and the dogs in the video are about her reluctance to give the dogs their medication, because it has a warning that pregnant women should not handle it.

Thirty years ago, this video would get him fired and ostracized. Today, it would get him elected to public office.

What a controlling, abusive shit head.