On Fleek is one of the most annoying phrases to become popular in the past few years. I wouldn't be sad if I never heard it again.

It's no Charlie On The MTA, but I approve.

omg I knew this was going to happen. I understand the concept of inflation.

My point is at this given time I would like to pay 60c for my kotex.

Which would be little under $8.00 for 12 in 2015 dollars. In 2015 a pack of 24 Kotex maxis costs $7.20.

Thanks for the new screen name, Kotex!

My takeaway is that next time I'm having my period I will say "I am in the wardrobe of my Royal Daintiness." So much more quaint than saying it's Shark Week.

the vagina is too foldy

How does one guide that? Like, I can see guiding a guy to your gspot, sure, but your clit? "IT'S THE FUCKING THING THAT STICKS OUT, YOU IDIOT."

Just when I was getting used to the fact that no one cared about my stupid boner.

"conquered the Muslim Grenada at the close of the Inquisition"

On the other hand, a man is given shit if he cries.

I think that you might be using Inquisition as a bit of a catch-all term for Isabella of Castile's "purification" efforts in Spain, which is incorrect.

Or people who have some kind of chip on their shoulders about being unpopular in high school and are trying for a redo. I had a teacher like this who would bend over backwards to make the popular kids like her. It's bad enough to watch fifteen-year-olds do this but watching a 35-year-old woman participate would…

Reminds me of 21 Jump Street (movie).

Don't give me that fucking look... you know what you did.

Story is retracted by Politico. Gawker, your turn:

This is some of the most dishonest 'journalism' (my god, I don't even feel right calling it that), I have seen in a long-ass time. And I'm no Walker apologist. If you all want to retain any sort of credibility as a news source, you need to issue a correction immediately. This entire article is a complete sham, and…

Sorry, but this is some seriously crappy journalism.

I'm thoroughly amused by all the comments attributing increasingly conspiratorial motivations to Scott Walker, when only a bit of research reveals his actual goal: http://college.usatoday.com/2015/02/27/u-o…

So nefarious! How dare he do what a university wants, because the data is already being reported?!