katsuospawn
katsuospawn
katsuospawn

"I wore maternity jeans for nearly three years after having my baby..." gets my vote for "Most Doomed Rallying Cry" ever.

"There is no evidence that people with mental illness make false allegations of sexual assault with a greater frequency than people without mental illness."

Seems like Colombia has legalized prostitution including women-run brothels with appropriate health/safety precautions in place for sex workers.

"Presumed guilty" may be a bit overblown, but you're sure as shit not helping by referring to the parties — at the investigation stage - as the "assailant" and the "victim."

Right on. I can only assume the intent is to turn assertions cleverly into postulates, by positioning them as beyond critical discussion.

Fair enough. Still seems an order of magnitude better than the average output here over the past year or so... for one thing, there's obviously some thoughtful intelligence at work.

You seem to be using "cheesy" as an attempted synonym for "pretentious", no? (And "sophomoric" actually exists as a word, which is convenient.)

... so pose as a pimp/agency owner involved in the underground/underage sex trade, and just collect photos instead?

Cultural appropriation!!

It's a striking pairing, at first glance... but the poster is of course anti-German propaganda from WWI (not a ripe source of anti-black bias, surely?).

"No thank you."

Someone who lacks social capital as well as determination.

Haha... awesome. Way to neg nearly an entire gender, you sexy thing.

Uh-huh. Nice try. If you wanna call the author terrible 'cause you think she suggests 13-year-olds should drink w/boys, you can't really cry "irrelevant!" when your age-based inference is shown to be wildly off.

Seems straightforward enough. She's writing from '92 (as she notes), and was born in '75. She's 16 or 17. (Alternate solution: add three years to 1989, when she was 13-ish.)

"Golfing remains super boring, tolerable only when soused."

The Visigoths? Let's see... an oppressed minority mocked for their speech patterns, assigned cruel n hurtful nicknames, subject to massive legal inequities and colonial oppression, and effectively homeless for generations?

Given that the OP was being sarcastic, your sarcastic reply risks getting lost in a whirlwind of meta-mockery... but fair enough, I guess.

"...slave-owner apologists..."

White? Huh? Obviously not. And the two actually got into a fistfight at SL - apparently over Givens' contention that the Robinsons had stolen money from her while she was house-guesting w/them over term break. It's not the most implausible accusation ever, but it's up there.