THANK YOU. I have known vegans, vegetarians, pescatarians...every foodatarian basically—all my life and I’ve never personally experienced this so-called sanctimony and condescension that some omnivores are so quick to point out. I HAVE had to listen to a lot of shouty complaints about how awful and annoying…

Don’t be silly. Paranoid Android and I, and a whole bunch of other posters, had a great time discussing ramen recently!

Okay but it also has a clause preventing you from bringing up their supposed sanctimony when none of them has even said anything to you.

If avatar customization was completely irrelevant, it wouldn’t exist.

Agreed.

The work had the phrase ‘Insert words’ above it, so I really sympathise with her. It’s not like she thought it was a random crossword, she thought it was art where you were supposed to interact with it. Other exhibits at the museum were actually interactive.

The title was (is?) “Insert Words” and she said she thought it was an instruction.

Putting Gawker in the same ballpark as Breitbart makes you look stupid

Gizmotech, part of the Glawkur media empire.

The “breakfast” one (why the whipped feta?) literally looks like Audrey II. Don’t feed her, Seymour. Fucking take her out back and put a bullet where that egg yolk is unattractively splooshing from.

At least it isn’t a red velvet avocado?

?

Always be sure to use Protect when encountering a Caterpie. No one wants to get a String Shot without protection.

Counter-counterpoint: Your feet are jealous of my feet but are too embarrassed to say anything to you.

As much as I enjoy the references, these are . . . .not good gifs

HighGloss let me repeat this to you since you're not seeing it: THERE WAS NO SEXUAL AROUSAL! None. Whatsoever. It was an emotion and adrenaline based reaction that probably had more to do with hormonal reactions than anything remotely sexual. STOP INSULTING HER HUSBAND! Stop! It's totally awful to compare him to a…

You're a fucking moron.

It is truly amazing to me how my comments on a couple of different Jezebel articles - and by extention, I - have been negatively judged today.

It's not very nice to imply that her husband is "pathological" or "aroused by children". To me it reads as though, much like the story in this article, her husband was experiencing an emotional rush from being a new father/witnessing the fruits of his (and her) labor. I doubt it was sexual in nature at all and much…

I think you should be given a timeout for posting this picture so that you know what you've done is wrong.