It’s just unnecessarily nasty. Why? Why would anybody write this about anyone? Are clicks really that important? It’s gross gross gross and they should feel bad about publishing this. 

Wow, I don’t know if it’s the recent turnover in writers, but more and more I find myself really surprised at the tone of Jezebel’s articles. This is extremely unnecessary, and I hope you’re never confronted by something like this when you ultimately lose a loved one.

While I do think it’s right to expect an activist like Tamblyn to be talking to her husband when he fucks up, I also don’t think we should expect her to be able to perform the miracle of being able to transform her oaf into someone properly woke or to air their marital disputes on these issues in public.

For the sake of my sanity, I’m going to go ahead and assume that this did not actually happen, and that the images of her in that jacket are photoshopped. I mean....that just....could not possibly happen. That she would be clueless enough, that no one would say anything....nope. This did not happen. (Doing the same…

Can you.

There’s that old Gawker feeling.

He’s not wrong about the poop thing.

He was reportedly fired in 1979 for shoplifting a hammer and a can of dog REPELLANT from a store. He was stealing the tools he needed to commit his crimes.

“I feel like people are so used to tight or bodycon dresses that old school dresses are often seen as ‘loose.’” 

I honestly haven’t been bothered by the fit of MM’s dress. I thought she looked beautiful. But I have seen so many comments about the fit that I’ve actually wondered if she lost weight that week with the stress of her family/father. I can easily see how that would make a difference in how the dress was fitted.…

Also, pretty rich that she would comment on the fit of Markle’s dress when Wickstead’s dress is so badly cut and makes the model’s boobs look like long, droopy socks.

Yep. And I’m side-eying the fuck out of her for not only yapping in the first place but seeming to blame Meghan for the fit/hairstyle instead of saying something like “the designer should have had the dress tailored more/the hairstylist was informal.” It’s....telling. Also, while I hate pitting ladies against each…

That does not look like the same dress. Just the same basic style of dress.

“Where is the orgasm?”

A show whose clever name is a reference to both lawsuits and wearable suits.

...a show that was, at least for its first few seasons, about two brothers who practice law together even though only one of them is actually a lawyer.

Ok a couple things though, she had a suspect list 1,000 names long and she was slowly working through them. You can’t actually start naming suspects in a book that haven’t been cleared by police because you’ll get sued and possibly completely derail a police investigation. I don’t think Patton nor anyone else is…

Yeah, no shit. Even if he’d said “we appreciate her work for keeping this unsolved murder in the spotlight and for bringing renewed attention to it,” that would have been something.

What? This case IS about the crimes committed. You mean this article? Cause there wouldn’t be article in the first place if apparently “this guy’s wife” hadn’t spent a lot of time working on this case and helped the police. You can’t ignore the fact that the police had nothing for years and years then it comes out the…

My first thought was Kenzo vs Weapon of Choice - both shot by Spike Jonze