YOU GUYS!

Still fuck off tho!

Neither option.

So tempting!

The adjective order is irrelevant. The intended modification and proposed contrast was not successful for me.

The fact that you are using your perception over my perception over someone else’s perception as opportunity to call me a troll without recrimination is proof that you don’t need to be a part of this discussion about how things are perceived to others.

Exactament.

I don’t disagree?

Which author? I am not talking about Farman’s piece and won’t suggest that I was or accept comments that I dismissed her interpretation or use of humor.

My main issue with the word choice is that the content of your article did not back up the claim. You only wrote “L.O.L.” plus the inserted quote. That for me isn’t sufficient evidence of a hilarious event and/or perspective. That also did not sufficiently prove that she found either her article and/or encounter as…

Dave Chappelle as Rick James saying CHARLIE MURPHY talking about Prince forever.

I like this but I also dislike this comment.

This is the coverage I’ve been waiting for. My best memories of Prince are of Dave Chappelle’s impersonations.

At first I thought you meant “blasting” as playing very loudly and I was even more at odds.

Was this filmed in the 80s?

I can’t say that I thought hilarious was a great word choice.

Come to the UK.

I feel like it will hinge on its blindingly white cast.

Wall Street Journal RN:

And leave America too, I hope.